And to be extra clear, I understand that some large companies benefit from FOSS without giving much back. That is shitty and I'm not defending that culture here. But I don't think you can have it both ways and taking the restrictive license approach as an alleged anarchist is particularly goofy.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Yeah he's an anarchist. That part is larping from him.
I'm not an anarchist, but I also don't pretend to be one. I actually agree with FOSS being voluntary and he should be free to license it however he wants within a legal framework. This clearly highlights my primary argument against anarchy. But that's a whole other topic. I just think it's goofy that he claims to be this big crypto anarchist and then uses government.
And I say all this with respect for what he's built. The products are very cool.