I'll choose my words carefully, because it's possible that we'll fall into a very repetitive trap of making the same arguments that have been made around these topics for centuries 😃 I assume you accept that economics is not a zero-sum game? For example, living standards have improved pretty consistently over centuries, for example with technology and process improvements? Neither of us think that a central planner can make perfect decisions, but we agree that governments can make harmful decisions? Is that okay so far?