I agree it doesn’t. The loud voices are just bored and want to play with things, not understanding that with over $1 Trillion in the network people aren’t going to leave them to just “play” like they want.
Bitcoin won’t move until these Devs change their tactics and stop pretending it’s 2013. They don’t even appear to know who their target audience is for changes, they just post platitudes about how it must.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
There is a social contract with the user base, most of whom are using it as a store of value. Some might not like the SoV use case, but it happens to be dominant. OP_CAT combined with OP_DUP can exponentially increase the memory usage of all the nodes, up to a limit. As memory is more expensive than disk, it's a bit like a block size increase in terms of using resources. Question is whether the use cases justify the risk, and also the risk of a contentious chain split. I am sure many of bitcoin's enemies would stir the pot there. OP_CAT is already enabled on liquid and no one uses it. I think they should show the user base how amazing it is in demos, and if the users say, "wow", that is a better argument.