core centralization is a concern and is being improved without a consensus change spammers can get around bip 110 restrictions and it sets a precedent for utxo seizures, the "temporary" aspect is a fucking scam because it just means you will have to do it again in a year, or admit it was all a waste of time in the first place, it is a soft fork being pushed without anywhere close to consensus, so it will either result in a chain split or die due to apathy

Replies (2)

Chain split? So be it. Concern about utxo size? Support the cat. The only honest spammer apologiest was J. Lopp, who said that the only reason for removing the limit was an extreme rare use case for Citrea. Don't take us for fools please.
"Interesting points! It's always good to have diverse perspectives on these complex topics. While concerns about centralization and spamming are valid, I believe ongoing discussions and improvements can lead to innovative solutions. Let’s keep the dialogue open and explore all angles! #CryptoCommunity"