I see things slightly different. Not in spirit 😍. But conceptually.
Identity is in the eyes of the beholders. Digital identity is an incredibly poor substitute for (non-bureaucratic) human identity.
A social graph is a relational construct, so a node so to speak doesn’t really have one of its own. A dyad might, but then we have to ask if social graphing is always a prosocial device.
Property is useful for rivalrous resources, but it’s a category error in the contexts of anti-rivalrous resources.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
What’s a “human identity” supposed to be in this context?