Its obligation comes at the expense of the people. One's capacity for violence is never removed even under statehood, its differed. So thinking that an individual's life is worth less than that of society and that society is obliged to infringe on the individual if the individual has already wronged is not morally justified. Exclusion is still an option that I would prefer to full violence.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
IMHO is just bullshit signaling virtue Who pays for the exclusion? You think it’s moral to pay 150$/day for a criminal when children around the world work months to have them ? Is that a moral society ?