You have a right to wait until it is banned and then what? Complain? Move to other jurisdictions? Or you think that with all negative publicity and just few voices in defense negative government report will transform suddenly into a positive law? In a free society you have privileges to correct wrong regulatory opinions. You can defend your industry, or just wait to see if really someone attempts to limit it. It is your privilege. I don’t have such privileges and have the only financial tool to lose/be negatively labeled and affect lives of many people I defend from financial exclusion/repression. And all of that just because there is almost no will from Norwegian bitcoiners to defend themselves.

I don’t need to be expert on Norwegian bitcoiners. PoW is very efficient mechanism - you can just see that there is no defence for bitcoin, it is just a fact. Your message, if I put it more politely, is “leave me alone and let it be as it is” doesn’t address my points, just exposing even more your ignorance. I don’t ask anyone to attend meetups, or doing abstract things in a social media. It will not help. Instead, as an expert on introducing reforms in different jurisdictions, Im raising awareness that: 🔹There is a clear need to provide with a well grounded expertise policymakers, journalists and communities. 🔹There is a clear necessity to ask policymakers to conduct public consultation before introducing the draft of the restrictive regulation. It is not about your books or podcast or even your mountain cabin mining. #FreedomTech should not be in a grey zone just because of someone’s arrogance - and I don’t care if it is arrogance of bitcoiners, who don’t care or prefer to move to other jurisdictions, or regulators who are dare to conduct public consultations and learn about #bitcoin. I hope it’s more clear now.

Well, I’m pretty sure we agree on the important mechanism of PoW. And I agree that the policymakers should have consulted the industry before they wrote this proposal. I have no direct insight in how this process was conducted, but I do know that it’s common practice when Norwegian politicians have these types of committees that they have an expert panel where the public is represented. As far as I understand, bitcoin / crypto mining was a minor subject in a larger discussion, and that’s probably the reason why the industry wasn’t included. But again, I don’t have the insights here (and I don’t pretend that I do so). If the government decides to propose such a law, they will have to send the proposal out to a hearing before they vote on it our parliament. So, again, the public be given a chance to speak up. My first impression when I read your post was that it was inaccurate and a bit speculative with your WORDING IN THE HEADLINE. FUD is not the way. In your reply to my comment, you wrote “there is almost no will from Norwegian bitcoiners to defend themselves”. This is not only incorrect, but also quite offensive to the people who are trying to build a community and expand the knowledge about bitcoin in Norway. You might be an expert in your field, but I still find your post and answer arrogant and partially incorrect. If this is how you conduct your work elsewhere, I don’t think you will succeed with this tactic here. In that case, I would prefer that you leave your concerns with “the unwilling Norwegian bitcoiners”. Glad you enjoyed the beautiful mountains of Lofoten when you were here.

I don’t mind disturbing people from their zone of comfort to defend human rights and #freedomtech #bitcoin, even if they think it is offensive to them, because I brought this discussion to public. Im not publishing my communication with Norwegian authorities because you as citizen can send just the same email as I did and get the same evidence, with no need to guess or speculate. I fight with real dictatorships, who tried to sue me for every my report and publication in the social media. So I know the price of the word I publish.