You're seemingly just a step away from coming to terms with the likely reality. I understand that in order to get something reviewed and published they have to skirt around making certain declarations, but if we have DNA contamination (confirmed as far as I'm concerned), a mechanistic pathway for that to get into cells with a carrier (also confirmed), and the expected outcomes from this (a rise in cancers and autoimmune conditions), I don't need another "peer reviewed" study to recognise what is probably going on. The same way we could use logical deduction to heed caution without a deep understanding of the science involved when this was all first introduced. Retrospective analysis will determine what is happening, but let's be honest here, the mounting evidence isn't looking good right now. The claims may be proven to be inaccurate, but they are far from baseless.