100% agree - but voluntarism is a part of the value4value ideology, I believe. Pay after you get the value, not in anticipation of it. If we require payment up front, before a good UX is witnessed, that's not value4value. That's just subscribing to a service that may provide value, you don't know until you try it. Trust that people want to support all of this, they've just never had a means to do so. Subscriptions don't win, as seen in the current web. Subscriptions provide you with access to a limited garden of suspect value. Let's just admit spam is one problem and support/funding the actual costs are another.

Replies (1)

I agree that volunteering is a good thing for things you believe in, and I agree that letting people try-before-they-buy also works well in many situations. Clients could certainly let people give it a try before asking for payment. Relays, however, probably not -- spammers will just sign up and spam during the free period, then we're back to whack-a-mole problems. I also agree that spam and funding are two different problems, but there's a vin diagram there with a lot of intersection between the two. I don't believe one will be solved without the other.