⚡🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 NEW - Professor Jiang analyzes the US-Iran War:
Iran sends a drone toward a US military base.
It costs $50,000.
America responds with a missile.
It costs $1,000,000.
The missile misses. America fires two more.
$3,000,000 spent. One $50,000 drone destroyed.
Iran makes 500 of these drones per day. They currently have 80,000 in stock.
Do the math.
Login to reply
Replies (26)
🗞
80 IQ analysis
hahah tnk you
I did the maths and got 11.8374. Admittedly maths isn't my strength.
Wait till HODL finds out.
I like this guy. Who is he?
Missile makers applaud as money printer starts to hum.
parasitosis psychosis;
View article →


nevent1qqsqw7j9pexc4lhsre8unggtpp4zm4fqc70rxl6m8pnhg8k5fhp5qqslgdect
This
I fucking wish it would work like that and that Iran will defend themselves.
View quoted note →

did Iran learn from Ukraine? or Ukraine learned from Iran
It is basic math really. Any "expert" saying otherwise is no different from the social distancing "experts" a couple of years ago.
US-Iran war is very different because there is no shared direct land border, so it is more dependant on remote fire than Ukraine-Russia war.
Just hit 40-day Earned 36k withdrew 10k SATs 

Satsman
Satsman — Free Bitcoin Education App
Complete 3 short daily missions, learn how Bitcoin works, and earn real satoshi rewards. Free to join. Registered in Cyprus.
Biggest clown on the internet
Você é burro assim mesmo ou se esforça? Ou você é apenas mais um desinformante filho da puta?
Fails to consider that the U.S. is using drones that cost only $35,000.
"muh expensive missiles"
Bro they just print it.
Nobody uses THAAD to shoot a low altitude drone you moron!
Fake news 🗞️
he did a whole class about this that i stumbled onto Saturday after all this started.
2024
this guy is a genius tbh, this whole lecture was incredible
Maybe this is the point, always needed good reason to debase.
The general logic seems reasonable, though a few basic searches suggest that THAADs are not commonly used for shooting down drones like these, as they're the wrong technology. Which makes me question how much expertise he has on the topic.
But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and have a listen to his talk if I get some time to.