Analogue Dog's avatar
Analogue Dog 2 weeks ago
The initial pricing put out by second.tech reflects the cost of on-chain operations at at very very early stage in Ark's development. The more Ark users there are, the cheaper the refresh fees will be, since they can be split between everybody in the Ark... happy to be corrected but I believe that this will be a linear proportional relationship. I don't quite understand what you mean by custodial swaps (possibly my lack of knowledge); I was under the impression that boarding and exiting the ark is completely non-custodial since the mechanism is multisig transaction-locks.

Replies (4)

Perhaps density can get refresh pricing down, but users are still bearing an ongoing cost for idle coins. Ark/Spark exist to affinity scam as Lightning wallets, so people can receive without a node/channel liquidity. Their product market fit is receiving via Lightning swap. You could use an on-chain onboarding, but that's also pointless, because if you're already on-chain you don't need a coordinator.
Analogue Dog's avatar
Analogue Dog 2 weeks ago
I agree with your view on Spark. The second.tech Ark implementation looks to me like a very honourable attempt to improve UX by removing onboarding friction in a covenantless reality.