I agree for the most part. Trump is such a shakeup to the establishment though that even though what's happening would likely have all happened anyway, it all seems more "out in the open" than if Kamala were in. We'd have all just been more blissfully unaware. So yes, the memes are definitely better in this timeline.

Replies (2)

I just question if it matters whether it’s all out in the open or not. I never imagined people would NOT be rioting after all this Epstein shit. Slowly and quietly, without anyone realizing it, Trump developed immunity from the Epstein files. That’s insane just think about it. Conservatives will die protecting him from his opposition. It’s actually impressive and depressing seeing this senior citizen play this role so well and everyone just believing it all.
It's not like people can exactly storm the capital and demand the files or we would have already done that decades ago. The possibility of fighting our way out was gone a long time ago. I bet people want to riot about all these things but it's not going to change anything imo. If trump was really immune or a free actor, he'd just release them all. He isn't doing that. I think there are two conclusions depending on whether you like or hate him. If you like him, he's being suppressed and restricted. If you hate him he's complicit and saving his own ass. In either case, what if the Epstein files really do come out, and the names on it are of people so powerful, that the overwhelming force against an uprising would be so much more apparent then vs now, that people would be even less likely to riot?