Sure, but it is my group. Of course I can kill it. That doesn't make it any more or less decentralized. None of the groups are permissionless, either. You have to have a creator of a group. They don't just pop into existence on their own. So.... I don't get the complaint. If I invite you to a party at my house, I get to control thy guest list, unless I allow other guests to bring their friends. But I'm still at my place. I'm not in a commie block house, assigned by a central administration. Does that make any more sense?

Replies (1)

Yes, but if you have a party at *my* house, you can send everyone home or I can do it without your permission. You assume that the common architecture of this is going to involve a room creator running a coordinator. That is most certainly not what the network architecture is going to look like.
↑