Then I am happy. Your replies are just quiet reactive. Seems like you did not yet invest in building principles to live up to.
But when you do not agree, state them. Maby it can bring our discussion to a productive point π
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I think our views are more compatible than it seems from the surface.
We donβt have to agree about that much to be able to peacefully coexist. Thatβs the beauty of Liberty.
And also why itβs so important to defend.
Happy to hear this from you. I think this can be true.
I think it is important to defend the liberties of the most exposed and vulnerable, to fullfill the idea of freedom. To me freedom means nothing, when it would only belong to a certain prototype. Otherwise I would only have the freedom to act in the manner of such a defined prototype.
And I am really speaking that this is in the end for everyone that wants to be free. Not only for the individuals that identify as LGBTQ+. Since when it would be ok, to attack them violently, whatever attribute can be found to legitimate every violence.
For how somebody clothes, religion, ethnic, size, color of skin, language or whatever attribute would be ok to legitimize violence, when it would be ok to attack LGBTQ violently.
I think we both want liberty for everyone. Not just for a stereotype. Since this stereotype would always be defined by the rich and powerfull.