Who should control the money?
The liberal state gives us a false dichotomy to organize society: something is either a sacred right of the individual or entirely controlled by the state. But the Church, in her wisdom, sketches out an alternative way to handle our affairs: subsidiarity. Broadly, subsidiarity breaks down rights and duties into the following categories:
- Individual
- Family
- Community
- State
In this context, it becomes evident that Bitcoin opposes state money management yet cannot scale to individuals either. It will be a tool to help us reorganize our society away from the poles of the spectrum towards the center of families and communities, which will be healthy for our political order overall.
David Caseria
dvdc@sovereign.app
npub1dvdc...d4rm
CEO sovereign.app | Empowering Financially Sovereign Families
Domini Nostri Iesu Christi universorum Regis 

I wish this weren't true, but X is still where all the interesting Bitcoin discussions happen.
Parenting is the greatest theology lesson.
If your Bitcoin price target isn't $♾️, you don't understand Bitcoin.
Everyone feels like they don't have enough Bitcoin
Some people don’t know how to win.
There is much consternation about the US government adopting Bitcoin, but it’s misguided.
We *have* separated money and state and restored the natural order. The state is adopting Bitcoin because it has no other choice.
The fight has just begun, but thank God we have the opportunity to fight.
In retrospect, the best thing to happen was that Trump lost in 2020. Now we will have 4 years of the ride or dies around him instead of a bunch of quislings.
Thank God 


I decided to reactivate my account over on that other site: 

X (formerly Twitter)
David Caseria (@davidcaseria) on X
Re-activated my account and decided to start from a blank slate. Going to try to keep a few rules this time around:
1. No following brands
2. No f...
Are any clients working on implementing NIP-61 yet? View quoted note →
Happy All Saints’ Day

