With respect to BIP110:
Knots 20260508: Yes
Old Knots: Yeah, but ask miners' permission
Core <=29: Yeah, but ask miners' permission
Core 30+: Okay, iff miners agree
LibreRelay: Okay, iff miners agree
Literally no node software actually *opposes* BIP110.
Luke Dashjr
luke_nostr@dashjr.org
npub1lh27...a9nk
Roman #Catholic, husband, father of 11 children, #Bitcoin Core developer, and CTO @npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze ; INTP;
I condemn fake "Catholics", cryptobros & pedos; see full bio
Scammers and bad actors have been claiming BIP110 was "dead on arrival" or otherwise failed from the first day Dathon Ohm published it.
It was fake news then, and it's fake news now.
BIP110 has consensus and will still succeed if we hold the line.
Happy Dependence on God day!
Remember, every moment that we exist, we exist only because God continually wills and conserves us in being. Were He to withdraw that conserving will for even an instant, we would cease to exist.
BIP110 creates a rare opportunity for bitcoiners we should take advantage of:
Unlike most consensus changes, it is extremely simple: with only 5 modified lines of code and 72 added, across 5 source code files, we can explain it in a way anyone can understand.
Take a look. Review BIP110 yourself:
BIP110 code review for humans
Certain bad actors are trying to distract you with lies about me supposedly calling for a hardfork or proof-of-work change/removal.
Let me be perfectly clear: I do not at this time support either.