Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr
luke_nostr@dashjr.org
npub1lh27...a9nk
Roman #Catholic, husband, father of 11 children, #Bitcoin Core developer, and CTO @npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze ; INTP; I condemn fake "Catholics", cryptobros & pedos; see full bio
Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr 1 month ago
With respect to BIP110: Knots 20260508: Yes Old Knots: Yeah, but ask miners' permission Core <=29: Yeah, but ask miners' permission Core 30+: Okay, iff miners agree LibreRelay: Okay, iff miners agree Literally no node software actually *opposes* BIP110.
Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr 1 month ago
Scammers and bad actors have been claiming BIP110 was "dead on arrival" or otherwise failed from the first day Dathon Ohm published it. It was fake news then, and it's fake news now. BIP110 has consensus and will still succeed if we hold the line.
Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr 1 month ago
Happy Dependence on God day! Remember, every moment that we exist, we exist only because God continually wills and conserves us in being. Were He to withdraw that conserving will for even an instant, we would cease to exist.
Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr 1 month ago
BIP110 creates a rare opportunity for bitcoiners we should take advantage of: Unlike most consensus changes, it is extremely simple: with only 5 modified lines of code and 72 added, across 5 source code files, we can explain it in a way anyone can understand. Take a look. Review BIP110 yourself:
Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr 1 month ago
Certain bad actors are trying to distract you with lies about me supposedly calling for a hardfork or proof-of-work change/removal. Let me be perfectly clear: I do not at this time support either.