The folks who got burned by coldcard have something in common with the folks burned by BIP-110: they placed too much trust in social signals and neglected to do their own independent research to form conclusions.

Looks like @Luke Dashjr and @Bitcoin Mechanic finally answered the question I posed to them 10 months ago in Lugano! 😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏

OCEAN just cockblocked the 110 fork chain 🤣 View quoted note →

T-minus 8 hours

200 blocks to go on the bip110.com countdown!

I need a waterproof notepad to record my shower thoughts upon because I often forget them by the time I get back to a computer.

Security engineers in 2026:

I really appreciate the Ask Gemini feature on YouTube. When I'm searching for an exact timestamp of when something was said on a lengthy podcast/ presentation, it does a great job finding the quote and saving me the time of having to rewatch the video.

Linux desktop market share has broken through 10% in North America 🎉

2 weeks until BIP-110 nodes blow up! Follow along at bip110.com

The U.S. Justice Department is prosecuting an American for allegedly providing U.S. border authorities with a passcode that wiped the contents of his phone, according to an indictment and media reports. This is thought to be the first known case in the United States where federal prosecutors have charged someone for the alleged destruction of data using a “duress” password built into a phone’s software. The case centers on a feature included in GrapheneOS, a custom Android operating system that runs in place of the software on most modern Google Pixel devices. Tunick’s attorneys confirmed GrapheneOS was running on his phone.

TechCrunch

US accuses American of allegedly wiping his phone using a 'duress' password during border search | TechCrunch

A U.S. citizen has asked a court to throw out the government's claim that he gave over a passcode to border authorities that wiped his phone&#...

I find the sociological aspects of BIP-110 to be far more interesting than the technical aspects. 110 supporters admit it's not a technical solution; the BIP itself admits it can't stop arbitrary data. But what's fascinating is the Bitcoin Puritans claim they are trying to fix "Bitcoin Culture" at the "social layer" by rejecting "woke Core developers." What's amusing about this is I see little difference between puritans and the woke folk they detest. AFAICT the only distinction is which particular attributes each group uses to select people for cancellation. Fuck woke mobs. Fuck puritan mobs.