Plz Bitcoiners do your thing and help us getting Lugano's Major's back in putting the Satoshi statue in an even more outrageously visible place of the city (yes, yes, I know, trivially sybil-prone method, our Lugano community could easily create 5000 burner mails, but don't make us do like Core shills spinning up 500 fake nodes every day, just use your own to sign, c'mon)!

Change.org

Sign the Petition

Restoration of the Satoshi Statue Artwork in Lugano- Ripristino Statua di Satoshi a Lugano

I'm on @White Noise white noise with my npub. Based. Write me there. I'll probably not read messages everyday until somebody integrates it into a Beeper fork (I may issue a bounty about that someday), since I'm too brain-damaged to use several messaging apps on GrapheneOS (also one of the reasons I don't check NorstrDMs and Keet messages everyday). But I'll read!

My opening speech at the last Tuscany Lightning Summit!

Pleas help, good NOSTR neighbors! Can you point me at some best practice for sharing a NOSTR profile? Is the gold standard for that still just sharing the same private key, or is there any NIP for some more elegant form of delegation?

Dishonest shitcoin shills, ranked from the most to the least annoying, as of now, top 10: 1) XMR 2) KAS 3) LTC 4) BCH 5) ETH 6) BSV 7) XRP 8) SOL 9) BNB 10) DOGE ETH and BSV shills used to be on top of the shortlist 2 years ago. XMR & LTC used to be on the bottom 8 years ago.

Incredibility well-designed and well-realized game by D++! Masterfully hosted by Martell! I managed to rug some money from @UNCLE ROCKSTAR, which is always my main goal in life!

There's a disgusting gaslighting operation going on, coordinated by retardinal shitcoin scammers, seeding around several factual lies: 1) "Valid or expensive things can't be spam: spam is always free and protocol-level-invalid" 2) "Most Bitcoin developers have always been against using mempool filters to fight spam, Core never did it" 3) "Core's mempool filters are working as always intended, there never was an unintentional and unforeseen behavior of the datacarriersize parameter in tapscripts" 4) "The block-increase via witness-discount shipped with Segwit to appease big-blockers didn't end up incentivizing spam over real transactions" 5) "Mempool filters are anti-free-speech and anti-free market censorship, a precursor to OFAC compliant blocks" 6) "Mempool filters can be, contemporarily, totally ineffective in creating friction to spam AND ALSO extremely hurtful for fee prediction 7) "Ordinals and Wizards are not a typical and overt shitcoim grift (with negative effects on privacy and UX for Bitcoiners) but legit technical innovation for Bitcoin" All lies. Absolute, clear, literal, evident, verifiable lies. I'm skeptical of filters as a long-term sustainable solution for spam attacks, where the attacker is well-funded enough to bribe miners into behaving maliciously. I think the only structural and long-term solution can only be increasing economic density of L2s, to fight L1 censorship and spam with fee pressure. I believe covenant SFs in general and LNHance in particular would greatly help towards such goal. But I don't tolerate the above lies. And sadly the LNHance campaign is now deeply entangled with promoting them.

I have long thought that the depiction of the "HODL" sub-subculture (within the Bitcoin subculture) as viciously statist, patheically cuck and dangerously anti-privacy, was vastly esagerated, at the hands of the specular "noKYC" sub-sbuculture (that also has its very serious issues: shitcoining, keynesianism, woke bullshit, etc.). Well, I have to admit the some red flags in this sense are real, and spreading. Some "HODL" folks would go to the extent to actually agree with privacy-focus shitcoiners in promoting "privacy coins" as better than Bitcoin (clear nonsense for technical and economical reasons). Horseshoe Theory of Bitcoin.