Perfidious Albion

High-functioning psychopathic murderers, whose dick gets hard when they kill someone, are either housed in supermax prisons or else they are heads of state.

I agree with Dave Smith. Today's episode was a good one. He knows so much more than I do, and is a much better speaker than I am. If you think I post interesing political content, this guy is in every way better than I am on Middle East topics. The only things I disagree with in the podcast are the sponsor ads (at least up to 54:00)

There are only a couple of interesting strategic decisions left. First is whether the US defends Israel against Iran. Trump said he would, but there remains an outside chance that he deceived Netanyahu, let Netanyahu hang himself, in order to get the monkey off of America's back, to free America of Israeli control. We will see if that is what happens. More likely Trump is just an idiot and will defend Israel. The second interesting decision is how much Russia and/or China backstop Iran. I'm not sure if they have to do it strategically... I think time alone will tip the balance of powerin their favor despite what happens to Iran. But they might wish to assert their dominance early and protect a very important strategic ally. If those both go the way I suspect, US will back Israel and Russia and China will stay back... then Iran will be destroyed and the collapse of the US led world will be slowed down a little bit. The ugliest outcome, as it will just kill a lot of people and still won't achieve what the US wants. But the ugliest outcome is usually what actually happens, unfortunately.

I think most people understand very well what is happening in the Middle East. But I still hear from time to time nonsense propaganda, probably from paid disinformation specialists. Nonetheless I'll try to counter it by stating what is going on. Iran has never attacked Israel outside of well-signalled and moderate retaliations to attacks by Israel. Yes, it is true Iran supports Hezbollah, Hamas, and Ansar Allah, who themselves directly attack Israel. But supporting a proxy is not the same as a direct attack. If it were, Vladimir Putin would be nuking Washington and Langley right about now. Clearly there is a difference between supporting a proxy and a direct attack. Iran was not a belligerent in the 1949 Arab-Israeli war, often called the Nakba, or alternatively Israel's War of Independence. Iran was not a belligerent in the Six-Day war of 1967. Iran is not an Arab nation. For some reason, many American's think Iranians are Arabs. Probably because they are an Islamic nation. But they created their own modified version of Islam called Sunni Islam with Zoroastrian roots. But I digress. Even though Iran has never attacked Israel first, Israel has attacked Iran many times over, from the stuxnet virus, to car bombs planted by motorcycles, to bombing their embassy in Damascus, to actual fighter jet attacks on the Iranian homeland. Many pro-Iranian people have felt frustrated that Iran just takes it and doesn't fight back, or responds in a somewhat pathetic way, where all their missiles and drones are shot down. They feel Iran is weak and should "teach Israel a lesson." And it is this point in the story where I need to take an important digression. In 1953 Britain and the US conspired to overthrow the elected government of Iran, and succeeded. But the people of Iran quickly got wise to what had happened. They lived under a brutal dictator until 1979 when they overthrew him and allowed the current militant religious theocratic dictatorship to replace him. Nobody likes the current militant religious theocratic dictatorship. But at least they were chosen by Iranians and not outsiders, and at least they are "powerful enough to defend us." When people are existentially threatened, they invariably turn to the most powerful defenders they can find, irrespective of whether they like them, of whether they are nice people, of whether they are moral people... all that matters in that situation is survival and that means power. Palestine turned to Hamas not because Hamas are great guys, but because they were the most powerful. Iran is not about to have an internal revolution. Iranians are more than ever united in support of their government and against Israel. Be very suspicious of news media or YouTube personalities arguing that Iranians are going to overthrow their government. This is a strategic disinformation campaign intended to trick Iranian dissidents within Iran into attacking the Iranian government from within, thinking they are much more well supported they they actually are. I'm sure they will sucker some people. There are always some suckers. The Trump negotiations were a ruse. When Iran agreed, the Trump team were thrown off.. that wasn't supposed to happen. Then the Trump team had to change what they were asking for to make sure that Iran didn't agree. Part of the purpose is to convince dissidents inside Iran that their own government is at fault for not making peace with the West. Part of it was to lure Iran into thinking they were not about to be attacked. Recently Israel executed a very successful military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, air defenses, top military officials and nuclear scientists. They struck residential areas where these officials and scientists live with their families, and killed far more innocent civilians in order to get the 6 or so targets. Israel doesn't play by rules of war, they don't care how many civilians die to get their target, and they twist rhetoric to assign the blame to their military target by saying they were using "human shields" when in fact, clearly, they were just living at home. This attack was so major that Iran could not simply let it go, or make a small symbolic retaliation. They are now compelled by the only strategic path that makes any sense, which is to engage in full war with Israel. Israel would have you believe that Iran was on the verge of building a nuclear weapon. They have said this over and over for the last 30 years. Their definition of "on the verge" strains credibility to say the least. But let's assume for the moment that they were right this time. Nobody builds a nuclear bomb and then uses it. That would be suicide. Anybody who builds a nuke and strikes another nuclear power is committing suicide. Iran would never do that. All of Iran's actions in it's dealings with Israel have been calm, cool, logical and reasonable. And any suggestion by Israel that Iran was going to nuke them is utter rubbish and you should not be swayed by such poor arguments. Iran only wanted deterrence so that Iran would not be attacked. Israel knew that once Iran had a nuclear weapon it would no longer be possible to strike them. So they wanted to strike while they still had the chance (also it overshadows the genocide story, and keeps Netanyahu in office, so lots of simultaneous reasons). This is the same reason Russia attacked Ukraine, because once Ukraine joins NATO Russia would not be able to, so they struck while they still had the chance. Iran's hyper-enrichment was a back-up strategy and a negotiation strategy. Yes, they wanted to be on the verge of building a nuke. They thought that being on the verge might be enough deterrence to protect them. Clearly it was not. Clearly what they should have done is build that bomb faster in secret. Because if Iran had finished the bomb, then Israel would not have struck them. People I generally trust on this say that Iran is definitely going to build that bomb now. Now that the war has started, I'm not sure that they should. I don't think it will create any effective deterrence after the fact. Iraq had chemical weapons and agreed to give them up. Iraq was then ripped to shreds. Libya had a nuclear program and gave it up. Qaddafi was then sodomized to death with a bayonet on camera. On the other hand, North Korea has nuclear weapons and nobody attacks them. Pakistan and India both have nuclear weapons, and it was probably the main reason that their recent scuffle came to a quick resolution. Iran has been preparing for this war for many decades. They are the world leaders in cement and concrete reinforcement. No other country has as much dug-in reinforced military forces as Iran has. Russia just got a bunch of its nuclear bombers destroyed. That can't happen to Iran because Iran is dug in. Israel and Iran are militarily equally matched. In some ways Israel is far superior. In other ways Iran is far superior. They are the 15th and 16th most powerful militaries in the world. Iran dominates in manpower, land power, naval power, natural resources, financials, logistics, dug-in concrete underground facilities, and ballistic missiles and drones. Israel dominates in air power, geography, nuclear power, and technological superiority such as cyberattacks and AI. Neither side is about to "win". And there is no easy way to deescalate the conflict that Israel just started. With US backing, however, Israel is much stronger than Iran. Israel will be hurt but they can eventually take Iran to its knees if Iran is not supported by it's allies. And that is where things get a bit worrisome. If Russia and/or China actively participate to support their ally Iran while the USA actively supports it's ally Israel, then this becomes a massive, devastating, and very long proxy war that will completely ruin both Israel and Iran. One thing that could shorten it is for Israel to nuke Iran, since Israel is a nuclear power and Iran is not quite a nuclear power. And I'm sure people will argue that Iran should give up because they should not take the risk of being nuked. But if Israel nukes Iran, Putin will probably then nuke Ukraine. Same argument goes both ways. You see, all the global conflicts are intertwined. The true superpower proxy war is global. Geopolitics has been interesting to me. But it just became less interesting. Because there are few off-ramps anymore. The whole thing is now on rails. All the interesting and consequential decisions have been made, the strategies have been locked in. The interesting part is over. Now we just have to live with the consequences, which doesn't interest me at all. I'm going to go split some more wood.

Now that everyone is focused on a war with Iran, the news is no longer about the starvation of the Gazans. So they will just be finally starved, their final solution. Never forget what they are doing. Never forget.

This is backwards. Gossip doesn't render RTL text properly. :-( ללא צבזורה חדשות ישראל

If Trump were president, this war never would have started

This made-for-TV ABC movie is known for being a major reason that Ronald Reagan became anti-Nuclear, made friends with the Russians and started nuclear disarmament.

The country that slaughters kittens for pleasure now thinks it can wrestle a grizzly bear.

I'll offer my services as a "down detector". I haven't noticed anything offline.

It was a bit of a suprise this morning to scroll down X and find a picture of myself.

X (formerly Twitter)

🗣 Free Speech Union ✊ (@NZFreeSpeech) on X

Our CEO’s Opinion Piece in The Post today: “Neutrality is not a retreat – it is a recommitment. It is a declaration that universities are p...

I was at Massey University peacefully protesting for the right of Don Brash, an invited speaker (and former leader of the National party, former Reserve Bank governor), to speak to the students who had invited him. The administration shut it down for "security" concerns that happened to have been created by people who didn't want Don Brash to have a platform.

This piece of fruit was 100% organic right up until the moment that we stuck this label on it.