Default avatar
npub1ak5k...0gwg
npub1ak5k...0gwg
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
Tried Black Buffalo--that's a negative, ghostrider. #snus #nicotine
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
I am this moment struggling to find the motivatian for spreadsheets. #monday
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
'Festival' is Latin for 'goodbye to joy'' 'Carnival' is Latin for 'goodbye to meat' neither is a good time
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
hands on keyboard mind in library heart on the trails #sehnsucht
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
Would rather read Hoppe, Mises, and Van Til today, but...fiat mine beckons. Table needs food. Time to punch in...
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
Says Hoppe, "Causality is a prerequisite of acting, as Mises put it." And of course, they're both correct. But what then is the basis or ground for this persistent cause-effect relationship which is 'taken for granted' in our plans-of-action? If _chance_ is ultimate, then we cannot assume the continuity of the cause-effect relationship. > 1. God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; _nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established_. [WCF III.1](https://opc.org/wcf.html) Even Mises' axiom of human action--helpful and true as it is--lives on 'borrowed capital'.
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
> Men cannot look at any fact whether within or about them but they must see in it the presence of God. Even when men have fallen into sin they cannot eradicate their sense of the presence of God. Sin is what it is precisely because _it is a negative ethical reaction to God’s inescapable presence_. Van Til, _Christian Theory of Knowledge_ (p. 247). One such 'fact' is human reason. We can have our synthetic a priori axioms and deduce from them but back behind them is the revelatory fact of reason itself.
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
GM ``` Q. 3. What do the Scriptures principally teach? A. The Scriptures principally teach what man is to believe concerning God, and what duty God requires of man. Q. 4. What is God? A. God is a spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, in his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness and truth. Q. 5. Are there more Gods than one? A. There is but one only, the living and true God. ``` [WSC](https://opc.org/sc.html) #CarpeDiem #CoramDeo #ContraMundum
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
Not all catholics are Romanists. Romanism is just one denomination among many--EO, Presbyterian, Baptist, Anglican, etc. Protestants are also catholic--we profess the ancient ecumenical creeds (e.g., the Apostles' Creed). Protestants _protest_ against Rome's deviations from the Augustinian tradition, and against their extra- or non-scriptural innovations. I realize most people don't care about the proper use of the word 'catholic' but we should: "sloppy languaga makes sloppy thought possible." Rome's centuries-old attempts to lay exclusive claim to the label 'catholic' are propaganda, plain and simple.
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
In tomorrow's Adult Sunday School, we'll finish up WLC 18 and cover [WLC](https://opc.org/lc.html) 19: ``` Q. 19. What is God’s providence towards the angels? A. God by his providence permitted some of the angels, willfully and irrecoverably, to fall into sin and damnation, limiting and ordering that, and all their sins, to his own glory; and established the rest in holiness and happiness; employing them all, at his pleasure, in the administrations of his power, mercy, and justice. ``` (Deo Volente)
npub1ak5k...0gwg 10 months ago
maybe I should go fix my #zapper, yeah? some of these youts need a good zappin'