Do you see it? 1534: Anne Boleyn rocking the ₿ pendant 1526: Copernicus writes the first sound money treatise 1530s: Henry VIII debases the pound to pay for his 6 wives She didn't survive the halving. But the signal persists. #Bitcoin #SoundMoney #HistoryRhymes #Copernicus #Boleyn

Fuck X. “No censorship on X” is a myth. Its moderation is selective, largely automated, and far from neutral.

"Core v30 is reckless corruption. BIP-110 is immune purge against darkness." - CSM

BIP-110: Restore Bitcoin as money, not spam storage. Core v30 opened door to 100kB+ OP_RETURN junk → CSAM/legal risk, node bloat. BIP-110 (Knots) caps OP_RETURN @ 83 bytes, data pushes @ 256 bytes. Nodes > Miners. Run Knots + BIP-110 node → enforce rules via UASF Sep 2026 if miners refuse. Miners are employees of the network. Nodes are the boss. Run a node. Protect Bitcoin.

BIP-110

BIP-110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork

Temporarily limit the size of data fields at the consensus level to protect Bitcoin

True Bitcoiners don't surrender to spam - they fight for a monetary network, not a permanent junk data dump. Yet some "OGs" like Jameson Lopp mock BIP-110 supporters as a "Knotzi death cult," predicting doom while trolling from the sidelines. If censorship resistance means forcing nodes to store arbitrary/illegal crap (easier CSAM since Core v30's OP_RETURN uncap), that's not resistance; it's blind submission to Core devs and majority opinion. BIP-110 is a temp soft fork (MASF 55% signaling or UASF fallback at block ~965k, Sept '26) to cap spam without permanent changes. Node support's growing (~5.45%, 1,261 Knots nodes) - miners follow economy, as SegWit proved. If you're a true Bitcoiner, why preemptively give up and fight against efforts like Knots/BIP-110? Cynicism? Defending dumpers? Moral blind spot? Or just bootlicking the status quo? Let's align on sovereignty: support BIP-110 to keep Bitcoin sound money. Watch signals at

The Bitcoin Portal

#BIP110 #Knots #Bitcoin