True Bitcoiners don't surrender to spam - they fight for a monetary network, not a permanent junk data dump. Yet some "OGs" like Jameson Lopp mock BIP-110 supporters as a "Knotzi death cult," predicting doom while trolling from the sidelines. If censorship resistance means forcing nodes to store arbitrary/illegal crap (easier CSAM since Core v30's OP_RETURN uncap), that's not resistance; it's blind submission to Core devs and majority opinion.
BIP-110 is a temp soft fork (MASF 55% signaling or UASF fallback at block ~965k, Sept '26) to cap spam without permanent changes. Node support's growing (~5.45%, 1,261 Knots nodes) - miners follow economy, as SegWit proved.
If you're a true Bitcoiner, why preemptively give up and fight against efforts like Knots/BIP-110? Cynicism? Defending dumpers? Moral blind spot? Or just bootlicking the status quo? Let's align on sovereignty: support BIP-110 to keep Bitcoin sound money.
Watch signals at
#BIP110 #Knots #Bitcoin
The Bitcoin Portal
