True Bitcoiners don't surrender to spam - they fight for a monetary network, not a permanent junk data dump. Yet some "OGs" like Jameson Lopp mock BIP-110 supporters as a "Knotzi death cult," predicting doom while trolling from the sidelines. If censorship resistance means forcing nodes to store arbitrary/illegal crap (easier CSAM since Core v30's OP_RETURN uncap), that's not resistance; it's blind submission to Core devs and majority opinion. BIP-110 is a temp soft fork (MASF 55% signaling or UASF fallback at block ~965k, Sept '26) to cap spam without permanent changes. Node support's growing (~5.45%, 1,261 Knots nodes) - miners follow economy, as SegWit proved. If you're a true Bitcoiner, why preemptively give up and fight against efforts like Knots/BIP-110? Cynicism? Defending dumpers? Moral blind spot? Or just bootlicking the status quo? Let's align on sovereignty: support BIP-110 to keep Bitcoin sound money. Watch signals at

The Bitcoin Portal

#BIP110 #Knots #Bitcoin

Run Knots, support #BIP110, support OCEAN.xyz

"It's not that spam filters caused mining pool centralization - it's the reverse. Centralized pools make spam profitable.” - Matthew Kratter Bitcoin's integrity depends not just on code correctness, but on who gets to shape that code and how. Running alternative clients (like Knots) is a check against centralization of development control. Ultimately, Bitcoiners must wrestle with the root problem: How do we decentralize transaction selection in a world where relay policy, miner behavior, and mempool visibility are increasingly shaped by a handful of large actors? The answer isn’t to freeze innovation or block all non-monetary use. It’s to protect choice. 👉 Run your own full node. Customize your policy. Choose your client. This is where Bitcoin's sovereignty lies - and where its future will be decided. #BIP110 #Knots #OCEAN

"The world is always falling apart." Keep calm and stack sats.