"That's the world we live in." A profoundly depressing sentiment. It encapsulates a resignation to the harsh realities of our time, acknowledging a world fraught with inequalities, injustices, and seemingly insurmountable problems. It's a phrase that carries a heavy weight of disillusionment. It speaks to the acceptance of a world where poverty persists amidst plenty, where violence and conflict are normalized, where discrimination and prejudice persist despite our supposed progress. The phrase implies a sense of powerlessness, as if we are bystanders in a world we cannot change. It's a reminder that despite our efforts, systemic issues persist, leaving many feeling defeated and disheartened. However, it's crucial to remember that acknowledging the world's flaws should not lead to complacency. Rather, it should serve as a catalyst for collective action and the pursuit of a better, more equitable world. While it may be depressing to say, it can also be a call to challenge the status quo and work towards meaningful change. Privacy is a fundamental human right inherent to our existence, not bestowed by governments. It's an innate aspect of our autonomy and dignity.

"I've got nothing to hide." We hear this one almost daily. The most interesting response we have come up with is simply asking someone if you can hold their phone for a minute. After the awkward chuckle, ask if they can hold the phone, but you can scroll through it and only tap with your finger. This simple social experiment seems to be the fastest way to encourage the privacy conversation. It's undeniably ironic when someone claims to have "nothing to hide" yet employs security measures like passwords, locks, and curtains. This contradiction highlights a fundamental aspect of privacy and security: they're not about hiding wrongdoing, but about safeguarding personal space and information. Passwords are digital locks guarding our online presence, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive data or accounts. Locks on doors serve a similar purpose, protecting our physical space from intrusion and ensuring a sense of safety. Curtains in bedroom windows offer privacy within the sanctity of our homes, shielding intimate moments from prying eyes. The irony lies in the fact that these measures are universally accepted as essential for personal security, even by those who claim they have "nothing to hide." In reality, it's about maintaining autonomy, safeguarding personal information, and preserving the right to choose what to disclose and to whom. It's a testament to our innate understanding that privacy is a fundamental human need, regardless of whether we have something nefarious to conceal. #privacy #cybersecurity #grownostr

Exchanges are going to fail, just like banks. I am all for mass adoption, but going about it using the traditional financial system (which is what causes financial problems) is going to put us in exactly the same situation we are in now. I believe two of the core philosophies of bitcoin are self reliance and financial sovereignty. So why are so many people wanting to put bitcoin on exchanges and have more government intervention? If we do not self custody bitcoin, and rely on an exchange, it is no different than taking dollars you earn, and putting them in a bank: they are not your dollars anymore. This trend of regulation is going to make bitcoin the thing is was designed to fight against. The corrupt financial markets are going to take the wonderful invention of bitcoin, and corrupt it the same way gold was corrupted with leveraged derivatives, and the same way the dollar has been corrupted with the ability to "print" new dollars into existence. When exchanges fail, just like banks fail, I think the government will seize all that BTC and hold it, the same way it seizes other assets. If an exchange fails, and a government shuts it down like a bank, it is no problem for the government to print dollars to reimburse the customer, and keep the bitcoin for itself. Especially if the scam FDIC is going to start insuring exchanges the way they do banks. The whole system is a scam. So why are we playing more into the scam? Keep bitcoin in the free market, away from centralization, and let it do what it was made to do, which is be in the hands of the people using it. Learn to use self custody, learn the tools.

Can we get some input some anyone living in Europe at the moment? Jack...you're an influential person, what is the word so far on this eye scanning spyware? OpenAI's Sam Altman-backed Worldcoin introduces an iris-scanning crypto plan to authenticate every online human. Launched on July 24, the project aims to provide a private means of verifying human identity amidst AI advancements. It garners mixed reactions, as some laud its ambition while others find it dystopian. World ID serves as a digital passport, using biometric data to prove humanity. Privacy concerns arise despite claims of data non-retention. The project's token gains traction on exchanges. Ethereum's Vitalik Buterin discusses potential and risks of biometric proof-of-personhood, addressing security, privacy, and ethical issues. Jack Dorsey and Anita Posch voice concerns about centralization and data management. @jack

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

People Still "Think" in Dollars Because of Reserve Currency Status One habit I notice many have is still measuring price and value in dollar terms. When I first meet with people and try to understand where they are in their bitcoin education, they have to "undo" the thinking of measuring in dollars. Similar to thinking in feet instead of meters, although the world uses meters. I feel once people can adapt their thinking, and are able to measure things in multiple currencies, like dollars, euro, bitcoin, and commodities, they will unlock what bitcoin can really do for them. It's like how experienced travelers can quickly measure things in multiple currencies. It might help to imagine the Internet as a country you can virtually visit, and bitcoin is the currency of that country.

"Just as one hand washes the other, both wash the face." Privacy and security are two different practices. Our client realized that asset separation (security) had nothing to do with his privacy...when his tenant knocked on his door... https://deltacharlie.tech/39943

How do you protect yourself when a tenant looks up your information, and shows up at your door? Read about our client who had quite an uncomfortable experience: https://deltacharlie.tech/39943 #privacy #security #realestate

Primarily using iris and primal, on a web browser. There seems to be inconsistency in displaying profiles. Primal shows followers, iris does not. Satellite does not have a log out option. 1. If you acquire followers on one nostr client, does that transfer to other clients? Yes, nostr is a protocol, and the code follows users to whatever client they use. But why would iris not display followers, and primal would? 2. When you lock Alby, being that satellite does not have a log out option, is one still "logged in?" #help

Fiat currencies can fail due to a combination of factors, including economic mismanagement, inflation, and the potential for corruption. Firstly, fiat currencies lack intrinsic value; their worth is established by government decree rather than being backed by physical assets like gold or silver. This makes them vulnerable to manipulation and overissuance by central banks, leading to inflation and devaluation. As more money enters circulation, its value diminishes, eroding people's purchasing power and undermining the economy. Governments can misuse their authority over fiat currencies to finance their activities or obligations by resorting to excessive money printing. This creates an illusion of prosperity in the short term, but it comes at the cost of destabilizing the economy in the long run. Hyperinflation, as seen in historical cases like Zimbabwe and Venezuela, renders currencies practically worthless, devastating savings and livelihoods. Moreover, the centralized nature of fiat currency systems enables governments and institutions to monitor and control transactions. This surveillance can lead to breaches of privacy, stifling personal financial autonomy. Individuals become increasingly dependent on the state's decisions, further eroding economic freedom. Corruption is another major concern. When governments possess the authority to print money, it opens the door to manipulation and cronyism. Politicians and officials can be tempted to use their control over the money supply for personal gain or to fund projects that secure their political interests, often at the expense of the public's welfare. To counter these failures and vulnerabilities, some argue for the adoption of alternative monetary systems. Cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, offer decentralized and limited-supply alternatives. Their blockchain technology ensures transparency and security, reducing the potential for manipulation. However, cryptocurrencies also face challenges like volatility and regulatory uncertainty. In conclusion, fiat currencies can fail due to inflation, government mismanagement, and corruption. The lack of intrinsic value and the ease with which governments can print money undermines their stability and value. People's financial autonomy can be compromised by surveillance, while corruption can flourish in a system where money creation is concentrated in the hands of a few. Exploring alternative monetary systems could mitigate some of these risks, but the transition presents its own set of challenges.