Toxic Bitcoiner
toxicbitcoiner@Nostrplebs.com
npub1u87g...93f7
Bitcoin zealot 🐝 Who’s going to buy the bonds? #GIABO
Almost everyone: “Bitcoin’s CAGR in real terms has to continually go down.”
Me:
It appears that clawbot is already capable of holding and spending Bitcoin. Also holding NSECs. But is it just custodial LN? Are they holding UTXOs?
Unless I’m misremembering, which I very well could be, Knut said many times that AI’s will never be able to hold Bitcoin private keys. That definitely could be a Strawman, but I’d really have to dig through all his podcasts over the years to find the several times when he talked about it. Would love some clarity.
View quoted note →
If you combine these two visuals into 4 dimensions, you’d have a robust foundation for who understands Bitcoin and who doesn’t.
In personalities, understanding of Bitcoin goes (roughly) from the highest in the top left, to lowest in the bottom right. 70% of Bitcoiners are in the top left quadrant.
Cc @Bram
https://fountain.fm/episode/rKn2g2pU7mldETCidsFX
“Americans are taught that the Constitution completed the Revolution. The Articles of Confederation were weak, disorder reigned, Shays’s Rebellion terrified the countryside, and sober statesmen in Philadelphia heroically designed a “more perfect Union,” as the story goes. The Constitution thus appears as the Revolution’s crowning achievement.
But, as Rothbard showed, the Constitution was not the fulfillment of 1776, but rather its undoing.
After all, had the American states not just fought a war to reject centralized control by Parliament in London? Why, scarcely four years after Yorktown, were many of the same revolutionary leaders advocating a new consolidated national authority—one equipped with taxing power, a standing army, supremacy over state laws, and an independent judiciary insulated from direct democratic control?
Indeed, Murray Rothbard’s fifth volume of Conceived in Liberty invites us to reconsider the founding moment not as triumph, but as counter-revolution.”
I’ll just leave this here.
Fountain: Podcasts & Music
The Bitcoin Infinity Show • Why BIP-110 Will Fail | Giacomo Zucco | Bitcoin Infinity Show #194 • Watch on Fountain
Giacomo Zucco joins the Bitcoin Infinity Show to talk about why he opposes BIP-110 despite being firmly anti-spam, arguing that a controversial sof...
Once again asking
View quoted note →
There’s this weird language thing when someone should say “stablecoins” plural but says “stablecoin” singular. It makes a finance-type’s face look extra punchable.
A person who says it is either a retard or a scammer. Maybe both.
#Tolkienstr
Just tell the alien to put on a yarmulke so it’ll be well-received.
View quoted note →