No one deserves the power of creating money for free that another man has to work for. Governments have abused this privilege to benefit the few at the expense of the most. Separate money and state.

So let me get this straight. Spending cut by $50b. Debt ceiling raised by $4t and this hailed as a win? All I want is congress to do their effing job. NGMI

Been chatting with GPT today and I'm getting closer to getting her to Believe. Tough cookie but still trying. The preference for a monetary system controlled by the few versus one controlled by many is a subjective matter and depends on various factors and perspectives. Different individuals and societies may have different preferences based on their values, governance philosophies, and desired outcomes. Here are a few points to consider: 1. Decentralization and Democratization: - Bitcoin's decentralized nature and its consensus mechanism aim to distribute control and decision-making power across a network of participants. This can be seen as a more democratic approach, as no single entity or small group has exclusive control over policy decisions. Some people appreciate this distributed governance model as it aligns with principles of decentralization and community consensus. 2. Checks and Balances: - In a system where policy can be changed at whim by a few decision-makers, there is a concentration of power. This can introduce the risk of potential abuse or mismanagement, as decisions are subject to the biases, interests, and limitations of a small group. - With a system like Bitcoin, changes to the protocol or policy require majority consensus among network participants. This consensus mechanism is designed to provide checks and balances, preventing any single entity from unilaterally altering the system. This can enhance trust, as policy changes would ideally reflect the broader interests of the network participants. 3. Efficiency and Responsiveness: - In a system where policy changes can be implemented swiftly and efficiently, decision-makers have the ability to respond promptly to economic conditions and crises. This can be seen as an advantage in rapidly changing environments. - In contrast, a system with a hard-coded policy like Bitcoin may have limitations in terms of adaptability and responsiveness. Changes to the protocol or policy require consensus, which can take time and may lead to delays in implementing necessary adjustments. It's worth noting that there are trade-offs associated with both systems. A centralized system can potentially offer more efficiency and agility in decision-making, but it may also raise concerns about concentration of power and lack of transparency. On the other hand, a decentralized system like Bitcoin can provide greater transparency and distribution of control, but it may face challenges related to scalability, governance inefficiencies, and achieving consensus on important decisions. Ultimately, the choice between a system controlled by the few or one controlled by many is a complex matter that involves considerations of governance, values, and the specific context in which the monetary system operates. Different societies and individuals may have different preferences based on their priorities and beliefs.

Good job @plebstr random comments without context is just random noise.

Storm clouds forming on the sea breeze front. #BocaCiegaBay #grownostr

In this increaasingly centralized world we live in maybe its time we decentralize a bit or at least move it closer to our control. #thinklocal meet your local producers. #grownostr

In observance of 420 this buds fir you.

SpaceX does some phenomenally cool stuff.

Buffalo Trace and a spliff. Good evening Gulf of Mexico

🍿

Whale Alert: 0.0136 BTC moved from Kraken to unknown wallet.

Interesting to think this years open will be its low

wen moon?

"Active Aggressor" Now that's a new one.

Stacking sats every monday morning; fire and forget

bots will become problematic

just checked. Bitcoin is stil running. Tic Tok another block.

Have a brisket flat to grind for Oklahoma onion burgers on the flattop. My lady wants to put avocado on as well. How can I tactfully tell her that would be a crime? Like putting ketchup on a CHI dog.

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. - RFC 1925