So TikTok will be bought from the two biggest media moguls? What can go wrong?

GM gang

I would like Ethereum without the Ethereum foundation

In Europe we now have agencies and banks that want to track cash. You can in detail see where and when someone pays with bank notes that have a particular sequential number.

heise online

Bill tracking: Increasing cash tracking worries data protectionists

If the serial numbers of banknotes are stored together with time and place of issue and this data is recorded steadily, the anonymity of cash is lost.

I love nostr

GM

GM

How is it going gang?

Friends, we are winning.

Wish me luck

💜💜💜

Where's my bitchat

The Epstein client list killed itself

GM

Who do we need on the platform?

GN

Question: To what extent do systemic or ideological forces in today’s society have an interest in weakening men mentally and physically — and what are the broader societal implications? --- Hypothesis 1 – Systemic: Modern Western societies, often unintentionally, foster the mental and physical weakening of men. A passive, demoralized, and dependent population — including men — is easier to manage. This weakening is not the result of a grand conspiracy, but a byproduct of consumerism, bureaucratization, digitalization, and social fragmentation. Hypothesis 2 – Ideological: Progressive cultural and academic movements increasingly frame traditional male traits (e.g., strength, leadership, stoicism) as “toxic.” This has led to the deconstruction of classical masculinity, often leaving men — especially younger generations — without a coherent identity or purpose. This is not accidental, but part of a broader cultural shift aimed at reshaping gender norms. --- CONNECTION TO CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 1. Systemic Weakening of Male Resilience a) Education System: Observation: Boys underperform academically compared to girls across many Western countries, particularly in reading and behavioral metrics. Why? Today’s school systems often reward obedience, verbal fluency, and emotional conformity — traits more commonly associated with girls. Boys with physical energy, competitiveness, and assertiveness are more likely to be labeled as problematic. Effect: Boys are conditioned early to suppress natural tendencies, eroding their confidence and sense of autonomy. b) Digitalization and Disembodiment: Observation: Many men now lead sedentary, screen-based lives. Physical labor, sport, and outdoor activity are replaced by digital entertainment and remote work. Result: Decline in testosterone levels (scientifically observed), poor physical health, and detachment from embodied masculinity. c) Medicalization and Psychological Dependency: Trend: Mental health diagnoses among young men are rising, as is the use of medication to manage ADHD, depression, and anxiety. Implication: Rather than being taught to confront and overcome struggle, men are increasingly medicated. The capacity for self-regulation, grit, and emotional mastery weakens. d) Bureaucracy and Technocracy: Observation: Modern life is increasingly outsourced to systems: governments, experts, algorithms, apps. Result: Men lose touch with agency, initiative, and leadership — traditionally male-coded traits. They are turned into users, not builders or protectors. --- 2. Ideological Deconstruction of Masculinity a) “Toxic Masculinity” Narrative: Definition: Originally intended to highlight harmful male behaviors like violence or emotional suppression. Problem: The term is now often used indiscriminately, leading to the stigmatization of any traditionally masculine trait — including strength, ambition, or stoicism. Effect: Young men internalize the message that being masculine is inherently harmful, leading to shame, confusion, or retreat. b) Media & Cultural Depictions: Observation: In TV, advertising, and pop culture, male figures are frequently portrayed as incompetent, immature, or emotionally clueless (e.g., the “dumb dad” trope). In contrast: Female characters are shown as morally superior, competent, and proactive. Consequence: Boys grow up without clear, aspirational male role models — drifting toward irony, nihilism, escapism (gaming, porn), or radicalization. c) Academic Gender Theory & Institutional Practice: Development: Gender theory, particularly postmodern and deconstructivist approaches, has influenced schools, universities, and HR departments. Message: Gender is entirely a social construct; masculinity is outdated or oppressive. Outcome: Rather than cultivating healthy masculinity, institutions often aim to dismantle it altogether. --- CONTEMPORARY CONSEQUENCES We are witnessing a convergence of: Systemic passivity (via digital life, consumer culture, bureaucracy), Ideological disorientation (via anti-masculinity narratives), Psychosocial fragility (via loss of challenge, discipline, and meaningful rites of passage). This affects men disproportionately because their traditional sense of self is more rooted in: Action, Embodiment, Initiative, and Responsibility. These elements are either devalued or redefined as problematic in today’s cultural climate. --- Conclusion: The weakening of men — mentally, physically, and spiritually — is not the result of a centralized agenda. Rather, it is a structural byproduct of modern society’s operating logic and cultural transformations. However, this trend produces very real advantages for certain interests: Governments benefit from more passive, less oppositional citizens. Corporations profit from insecure consumers addicted to distraction and self-medication. Ideological movements advance their visions by eroding traditional roles and hierarchies. The result is a growing number of men who are physically disengaged, emotionally unstable, and culturally disoriented — a condition that threatens not only individual well-being but the future of families, communities, and democratic resilience. ---

GM