Marius

What's wrong with Europe. Sabine Hossenfelder puts it into words. https://youtu.be/iH0aij_A08A?si=MbWf0-sFI7ANb5dt

Ok, that's it. My X account received a "label" for whatever ridiculous reason. I'll now be Nostr + Wordpress first. Screw this centralized shit.

One of the many things we experience is the simultaneous reaching for more alongside the subconscious knowing that the little we have is all we truly need. We seek noise, though silence holds the answer. We look to the future, we look to the past, yet we forget the now. We live here. We live now. The illusion of the future and the weight of the past hold us captive. It is like a pendulum, swinging from what was to what ought to be. From what made us happy to what might make us unhappy. We cling instead of letting go. We try to force the future into submission, forgetting all the while that the future emerges with effortless grace in the here, in the now. Let us flow. Not blindly. With visionary intention. Instead of waiting for tomorrow, let us be today who we wish to be tomorrow. It is what is born today that shapes the morrow.

The funny thing is that she's correct in a certain sense. The internet should be decentralization maxxed and not rely on a few choke points like Cloudflare, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, OpenDNS, Let's Encrypt... We need much more P2P routing, Web3, decentralized identifiers, etc. No single point of failures should exist so we can end big tech AND big government's influence.

What if the people not using LLMs today will lose temporarily in the marketplace because they cannot compete efficiency wise, yet the exact same individuals will become irreplaceable 5 years from now, because they're the last independently intelligent, creative humans on earth?

As AI keeps advancing, we must advance ourselves spiritually. We need to raise our collective consciousness to the frequency of love. If we fail, we will become an extremely technologically advanced society – with no heart. We will just be like machines. This will be truly dystopic.

I say that current AI is AGI. It is not obvious yet, because we haven’t yet connected very complex and fragmented software and data environments – and for R&D to turn into real-world change is a multi-year process anyway. Even if we stopped and freeze AI development here and now, we’d only realize that we indeed have AGI 2 or 3 years down the road. In some niches it will be faster (software or law) in others slower (complex logistics). However, AI development is not stopping here and now. It continues to improve – I say exponentially. Even if you are more conservative, then the linear growth still has undoubtedly a large rate of change. Today (!), we have AI models that evolved from barely completing sentences to writing code that ships to production, we have AI doing PhD-level research, and achieved gold medal-level performance on the International Math Olympiad. AI is solving medical problems that baffle experts. Again – what is currently mostly manually prompted work in long chat conversations will soon develop into agents that can do almost all knowledge work fully autonomously. I’m not talking about AI as an assistant, as a co-pilot. It will just straight up finish the work while you are napping on the beach. The difference between the GPT-3 model and today’s models – whether Grok 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, or ChatGPT o4 – is like comparing a Nokia 1011 to an iPhone 16 Pro. We went from purely text based chats to multimodal understanding – models that can see, hear, and reason across domains simultaneously. AI is starting to genuinely understand context and nuance in ways that feels human. The next phase is not purely larger AI models, but models that learn continuously. They can remember you, plan and execute multistep tasks over days, weeks, or months. An AI system that perfectly remembers, understands context, who never sleeps, and gets smarter every day. This is being built today in AI labs around the globe. We have AGI today, and it is only a matter of time for us to arrive at superintelligent AI systems. Is it 2 years? 3 years? 4 years? 5 years? Irrelevant. Whether it is 1 year or 10 years, the implications are the same: everything is going to change forever.

I think CBDC are actually brilliant, because the black labor market will still exist, and they obviously will not use CBDCs. They will use Dash, Zano, ZCash, Monero. Ergo, finally we see real world adoption of useful privacy-friendly cryptocurrencies due to NNT's minority rule.

Looking back, I was most successful when I actually didn't care at all about the results of my work. I expected nothing. I simply went with the flow. Everything just inexplicably fell into place. I met people, published articles online, and opportunities just came along out of the blue, deals closed without resistance. However, in the past 2 years – primarily after my son was born – I put a lot of internal importance on "having to succeed". I put a lot of pressure on myself. I was more disciplined, I was working more on larger goals I set myself. But very strangely, everything became notably harder and financial success effectively ran away from me. Because it simply isn't working, I decided to remove all of this importance and pressure; to detach completely. Not caring about the end result. Moving with the flow. Paying attention to synchronicities. Moving with the most exciting thing I can do – even if financially it looks irrational. ¡Venga! P.S. maybe there is a reason you read this? Send me a DM ;)

I'm quite disappointed in the quality of posts on this platform. My feed is full of noise, nonsense, and division. Nostr/Primal should do a much better job in discoverability. The main mistake is valuing followers and engagement over substance. In Subreddits, for example, you can provide value without requiring social proof in the form of followers. Ironically, the best accounts on X are often between 739 and 10.142 followers. Beyond that, most accounts maximize for engagement and the value provided drops. There should be zero incentive to maximize followers. Instead, there should be an incentive to maximize "value provided". Nostr has this great feature for zapping microtransactions. Medium - I believed - tried to achieve this by allowing you to "heart" an article multiple times. The number one metric should be value provided measured through: "time spend reading" an article, the amount of collected $, the amount of bookmarks, etc. Following should become a much more exclusive feature that either costs a small recurring microtransaction of $ (each follow costs $0.10 / month and goes 100% to the followed account) or has other psychological barriers (i.e., you receive ALL posts as an email or notification) so this way you choose carefully who to follow.

AI generated content is a real problem now. I'd pay for a version of social media that is 100% authentic human.

Anstatt auf die Einwanderung muss sich Deutschland auf die Auswanderer fokussieren. Wenn Auswanderer keine Gründe mehr haben, auszuwandern, dann ist das Einwanderungsproblem bereits gelöst.

Our 2YO son was eating very selectively, and we worried he's eating too little. I thought about it. And I realized we place too much importance on him eating by encouraging him to eat. I said to my wife: you know what, we remove this importance totally. We don't tell him, ask him, encourage him to eat anymore. If he wants to eat, he can eat. If not, then not. Guess what happened? He's now eating satisfactorily. But not according to our schedule or exactly what we cook. According to his schedule. I also started asking him in the supermarket what he'd like to eat this evening. Then he points at particular things: broccoli at one day, chicken filet at another day, pickled cucumbers, etc. And guess what? He absolutely is eating what he picked earlier. Very instinctively to what nutrients his body wants. Maybe this helps other young parents. Stop putting importance on it.

Biological age calculations are the biggest modern day psyop. The only signal you need is when you're talking to people and mentioning your age, they reply "Wow, I thought you were much younger" Everything else is noise.

Good Morning. Breathing the fresh early morning air after a rainy night is pure bliss from God.

Marathon running is socially encouraged orthopedic self-harm disguised as virtue. 42 km of joint erosion, cardiac overreach, and dopamine-chasing disguised as discipline. Before you commit to run a marathon, take a moment and pause. Ask yourself: Why is running a marathon my goal? Odds are, you’re either unconsciously copying someone else’s coping mechanism or seeking social reward and Instagram likes through performative suffering – and calling it “fitness”. That’s not discipline. That’s mimesis. Read Girard. You’re not chasing health but someone else’s pain prescription, hoping it will fix your own. And if you really need to suffer publicly to feel alive, maybe it’s not your body that needs training, but your fear of sitting still without applause. If the idea of running a marathon truly comes from your heart, then you’d run 42 km on a Tuesday at dawn with no witness. If you need a start line, a medal, a round of applause, and pictures for social media, then you are suffering through a socially accepted identity crisis. Let’s get physiological. Marathons attack your hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, suppress your immune system, and can induce irreversible joint damage – knees, hips, ankles, worn one kilometer at a time. Cardiac scarring is a real risk. Cortisol floods. Lymphocyte counts crash. This really isn’t health but a ritualized system failure. Discipline is not a spectacle. Movement is not masochism. Read Body by Science (Doug McGuff & John Little). Explore movement systems like Ido Portal’s (or try Kung Fu). Train for capacity, not applause. Stop running from the void. It keeps up.

Whether current AI systems qualify as AGI is beside the point. Five years ago, if you had asked me to define AGI, my answer would’ve closely described what GPT o3 or Gemini 2.5 Pro are now. So if this is AGI, then where are the breakthroughs? Valid question. The answer: we are the bottleneck. The limitation is no longer the model. The real limitation is that we haven’t really figured out how to use LLMs properly. Even if AI development froze today, and all we have available are o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro level LLMs, then we would still see a decade of profound disruptions and innovations across entire industries. Most users treat AI like Google, a friend, a mentor, or a novelty. Few understand prompting. Those who do don’t even scratch the surface of what is possible when you give AI the right prompt, the relevant context, and access to specific or perhaps proprietary data. Worse, we are not augmenting human intelligence, we are outsourcing it. TikTokified workflows, mindless automation, and prompt-template copy-paste culture are commoditizing subpar outcomes. Instead of expanding our minds, we’re paralyzing them. The real potential lies hidden in tandem cognition. Reimagining how we work with AI systems in a way that ensures our uniquely human traits (intuition, creativity, vision, …) aren’t ignored, but amplified. Without this shift, outputs will commoditize (across humans and organizations). We urgently need two things: first a methodology for extracting maximum value from LLMs and second a philosophy for not replacing our human genius, but empowering it. The future is not AI versus human. It is human with AI, at full capacity. Currently, the focus is on maximum capacity for AI compute. Now it’s time we focus on maximum capacity for human genius.

NOW The future is an illusion. Just as is the past. There is only now. Everything that is truly meaningful is happening now. You shape the future by your actions now, by your thoughts now, by your love now. Any moment is the future. There is only now.

General rule: If you have real eye contact with someone (ie. more than some split seconds), the other person is 100% interested in you. Now all you need to do is say "Hello, …"

Many are destroying their health because they eat what others, these so-called 'gurus,' tell them is healthy. The real problem is, even if it's subconscious, their own energetic disagreement or unhappiness about forcing it down essentially taints the food. So, that 'healthy' stuff becomes negative for them because their internal state rebels against it. Ergo: genuinely and authentically believing that whatever you're putting in your body is actually good for you is incredibly powerful. Don't eat sweets, eat McDonald's, or drink beer when you believe or know that it is bad for you. However, look at someone like Warren Buffett who famously enjoys things like McDonald's and Coke daily and is thriving well into his 90s (he turns 95 this year, 2025). I believe a major reason is that he puts zero negative stress or excessive importance on his diet; his straightforward belief that it's fine for him probably neutralizes a lot of the harm that others might experience from the same food (even making it a good/healthy food for him).