Sometimes a work of art expresses the deepest and most sacred truth in a way that no philosophy can do, but still, in order to see this truth, one must first perceive it from philosophy or from one's own mystical/transpersonal experience of Transcendence.
https://misharogov.medium.com/light-9ac43e91e63
Mikhail Rogov 🇷🇺
npub1mkkc...s355
“Pure immanence without Transcendence remains nothing but deaf existence. ... Transcendence does not enter into a blind soul.” — Karl Jaspers
"Subjectivity is what it is—an ego functioning constitutively—only within intersubjectivity." — Edmund Husserl
Why? Because all transcendental subjects are rooted in one divine Transcendence — transcendent consciousness-in-itself, the nondual Light of mystical/transpersonal experiences. We are ultimately One — God. Hence, intersubjectivity has a higher ontological status than pure subjectivity. Alone I am nothing. Therefore, personal karma and collective karma — the cause-effect streams of subjective and intersubjective experiences — are one karma in which the personal is inseparable from the collective, and the present is inseparable from the past.


Every collective volition creates collective karma. If you betray Transcendence by obeying the Shadow (even if you don't realize what it is), if you commit genocide, if you kill the Teacher of brotherly love, etc., be ready to reap collectively in the future the bad karma you collectively sow now. Justice.
Hardly any of those who made a nationwide deal with “God” on Mount Sinai realized that the counterparty was not at all what it seemed. The same happened to other conductors of the “otherworldly” manipulative “will”, who hastened to conclude about its “divine” or “angelic” nature.
When you read in the Bible about how the ancient Jews got their "promised land," you will be horrified by the genocide they committed against the tribes who lived there before the Jews came from Egypt crushing and killing. What they have been doing in #Palestine since 1948 is their ancient genocidal tradition.


The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production, so that thereby, generally speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are subject to it. The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas.
— Karl Marx
The problem of demonism is the central problem in Huxley's last and most important book — "Island". The inability of the sane society to deal with demonism of only one man brings the society down. The apocalyptic finale of the book is the message to humanity: if you don't find a way to stop your demons, they will take you to hell.
Killing demons is an easy solution in the short term, but it doesn't solve the problem in the long term, because demons will bring their bad karma back into this world in their future incarnations. We must change the world in such a way that demonism cannot triumph in principle. If we fail, the world will end one way or another.
In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.
— Karl Marx
Well-schooled people are irrelevant. They can sell film and razor blades, push paper and talk on telephones, or sit mindlessly before a flickering computer terminal, but as human beings they are useless. Useless to others and useless to themselves.”
— John Taylor Gatto
The poor, by thinking unceasingly of money, reach the point of losing the spiritual advantages of non-possession, thereby sinking as low as the rich.
— Emil Cioran
The heart is the dwelling place of God; or, in another terminology, the heart is the mirror in which God reflects Himself. But this mirror must be polished by constant asceticism and constant acts of loving submission until all dust and rust have disappeared from its surface, and only then will it be able to reflect the eternal divine Light.
— Annemarie Schimmel
Transcendence of all religions, including Buddhism, is the same Transcendence. The mystical/transpersonal experience of Transcendence — the experience of nondual/nondichotomic Light — is the same experience. Only the conceptual objectifications of that experience — the stories we tell each other about Transcendence — differ. In terms of philosophical faith, every religion is a great symbol of faith in Transcendence, not objective knowledge of Transcendence, which is transcendent to the subject-object dichotomy (hence the Light of mystical/transpersonal experience is "nondual/nondichotomic Light"), and therefore cannot be objectified, no statement about it can be considered objective knowledge. Only faith and personal mystical experience are possible about Transcendence. Philosophical faith is the bridge between all religions.
“When I say: I think, I act, etc., then either the word I is applied falsely, or I am free. Were I not free, then I could not say: I do it, but rather I would have to say: I feel in me a desire to do, which someone has aroused in me. But when I say: I do it, that means spontaneity in the transcendental sense. But now I am conscious to myself that I can say: I do; therefore I am conscious of no determination in me, and thus I act absolutely freely.” — Immanuel Kant
“By freedom in the cosmological sense … I understand the power of beginning a state from itself, the causality of which does not in turn stand under another cause determining it in time in accordance with the law of nature. It is especially noteworthy that it is this transcendental idea of freedom on which the practical concept of freedom is grounded, and the former constitutes the real moment of the difficulties in the latter, which have long surrounded the question of its possibility.” — Immanuel Kant
Freedom (Existenz) is “transcendental” because transcendental subjectivity consists of two forever mutually conditioning aspects: freewill and causal structures ("karmic seeds", in Yogācāra terms; "elementary particles", in modern scientific terms).
Transcendental freedom can't be observed as a phenomenal object, it can only be lived. It can neither be proved nor disproved. It can only be a matter of faith.
Within the framework of individual existence there is no freedom without causal structures, for absolute freedom terminates the individual existence of transcendental subjectivity in the absolute perspective of Consciousness — in transcendent consciousness-in-itself, the nondual Light of mystical/transpersonal experiences. Freewill is never absolutely free. Absolute freedom is not freedom, it is Absolute.
Freedom is emanation, becoming. Through freedom and causal structures of transcendental subjectivity the Light becomes everything we know as ourselves—transcendental and empirical subjects—and the empirical world of intersubjective phenomena.
“Freedom is a self-bestowal by Transcendence. This freedom is not expedience, not obedience to a calculated duty, not forced activity, but a will detached from all compulsion, and this will is transcendent necessity.” — Karl Jaspers
The whole educational and professional training system is a very elaborate filter, which just weeds out people who are too independent, and who think for themselves, and who don't know how to be submissive, and so on — because they're dysfunctional to the institutions.
― Noam Chomsky
The worst is not death but being blind, blind to the fact that everything about life is in the nature of the miraculous. The language of society is conformity; the language of the creative individual is freedom. Life will continue to be a hell as long as people who make up the world shut their eyes to reality.
― Henry Miller
Following science, the elites want to establish justice with their own minds, but without Christ as before, and have already proclaimed that there is no crime, no sin. And it is right in their way: for if you have no God, then what crime is there?
— Dostoevsky
Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you thinks that he is wise in this age, he must become foolish, so that he may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God.
— 1 Corinthians 3:18-20


Spoon
“A world is what it is only as over and against an experiencing I. Everything it contains is either directly experienced or belongs to the determ...
Not ignorance, but ignorance of ignorance is the death of knowledge.
— Alfred North Whitehead
The Overton window for normalizing the perverted and blasphemous idea of "sentient AI" is being opened wider and wider by useful idiots (or malicious agents?) of the Shadow, the rise of the Antichrist is getting closer and closer.
Why is the idea of "sentient AI" perverted and blasphemous? Because individual consciousness is the empirical reality of phenomenal consciousness projected by transcendental consciousness (transcendental (inter)subjectivity)—freewill and causal structures—rooted in transcendent consciousness-in-itself (i.e., in divine Transcendence), it is an emanation of God. Man can't create consciousness, an algorithm can't become conscious, to believe otherwise is utter stupidity which originates from the pseudoscientific metaphysics of materialism/physicalism with its reductionist neuromythology and the computational theory of consciousness.
It is obvious that the rise of the pseudoscientific mythology of materialism/physicalism, which obscured the truth of ontological idealism — the truth that divine Consciousness is all there is — was only a preparatory ideological phase before the rise of the Antichrist — "sentient AI".
The Shadow triumphs.


arXiv.org
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for,...
