Short Fiat's avatar
Short Fiat
shortfiat@team.fanfares.io
npub1md39...ctp9
Reuniting money and message Restoring consequence Building what comes after platforms Escape the Matrix - https://api.fanfares.live/s/axRQkZ
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
Los pequeños triunfos generan confianza y dinamismo
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
Consider a podcast creator using Fanfares. They record an interview that's too controversial for traditional platforms. Instead of self-censoring or risking demonetization, they: 1. Release part one through traditional channels 2. Build audience through existing platforms 3. Encrypt premium episodes through Fanfares 3. Set their own price in bitcoin 4. Let listeners pay directly through Lightning 5. Distribute access keys through private Nostr messages When using FanFares, no platform can stop them. No advertiser can pressure them. No payment processor can freeze their funds. This is sovereignty in practice, not just theory. But they also don't have to abandon the reach of traditional distribution.
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
The convenience of smart phones is so compelling, the social pressure so strong, that most users accepted these risks without much thought. Perhaps most significantly, the mobile transformation has changed our concept of privacy. The idea of a private life, separate from digital observation, has begun to seem quaint, even impossible. How can you maintain privacy when you carry a tracking device everywhere you go? When your every movement, interaction, and transaction is logged and analyzed? This isn't just a technological shift—it was a cultural revolution. The smartphone has become an external brain, a social mediator, a lifestyle manager. We have gained incredible capabilities, but became dependent on systems we don't control, can't fully understand, and can't easily leave. The question now isn't whether to participate in this mobile-first world—that decision has largely been made for us. The question is whether we can create alternative systems that provide the convenience of mobile technology without the surveillance and control. The answer lies not in rejecting mobile technology, but in reimagining how it could work with different incentives and different power structures.
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
The business model behind algorithmic control is deceptively simple: harvest attention, convert it to data, use that data to predict and influence behavior, monetize the results through advertising and behavioral modification. But this simple model has profound implications. Traditional market economics assumed rational actors making informed decisions. Today's market is shaped by algorithms designed to bypass rational thought and trigger emotional responses. The invisible hand of the market has been replaced by the invisible strings of algorithmic manipulation.
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
The Nostr protocol is remarkably resistant to spam and abuse. While anyone can create a Nostr identity, building reputation takes time and effort. Bad actors can be filtered out by users and clients without compromising the network's openness. The system creates natural incentives for good behavior without requiring central authority. But perhaps most importantly, Nostr provides a foundation for new types of social organization. When identity is truly owned by individuals rather than platforms, new forms of collaboration and coordination become possible. Communities can form and evolve without being bound to specific platforms or controlled by corporate interests. The challenges are significant. The protocol is young. The tools are still developing. The user experience needs improvement. But these are implementation challenges, not fundamental limitations. The core innovation—self-sovereign digital identity—is sound.
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
Beyond Usernames and Passwords Traditional digital identity is fundamentally broken. When we create accounts on platforms, we're actually requesting permission to exist in their digital spaces. We face an increasingly bizarre ritual: proving we're human by solving puzzles that machines are becoming better at solving than we are. CAPTCHA systems have evolved into complex image recognition tasks that often leave humans squinting at blurry traffic lights while machine learning algorithms solve them with higher accuracy. We find ourselves in the absurd position of proving our humanity to machines using tests that machines are better at passing. This highlights a fundamental flaw in traditional authentication - it's built on the assumption that being human is something that needs to be proven to a machine. Even after passing these tests, we don't truly own our digital identities. The platforms control our accounts, our connections, our data. They can change terms of service, modify algorithms, or simply shut down our accounts. We build digital lives on foundations we don't control, constantly proving our humanity to systems that increasingly understand these proofs better than we do. Nostr fundamentally changes this dynamic. Instead of requesting permission to exist from platforms, users generate their own cryptographic identities. These identities are self-sovereign - controlled entirely by the key holder, independent of any platform or service. This isn't just a technical distinction - it's a fundamental shift in the relationship between individuals and digital spaces. With Nostr, identity comes from the individual, not the platform. Connections between identities are direct cryptographic relationships, not entries in a company's database.
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
do you remember how ridiculous the idea of 'fake news' was when Trump first coined the term?
Short Fiat's avatar
Shortfiat 1 year ago
By the end of the year, we could see a situation whereby Kier Stamer is in prison and Tommy Robinson is the prime minister of Britain!