Playing with Voyage. I like it a lot so far. Although I miss the memes, the minimalistic vibe is amazing. Thinking how to integrate it with some Lora based mesh (like Reticulum) to have a local city district relay to completely bypass internet. It would need much more compression though. It should be integrated first at relay level probably and then local mesh node would do a relay interface.

I wish Nostr was one...

For me, this book was when it clicked for me. Now as an audiobook thanks to @Max https://freemansperspective.com/audiobook-a-lodging-of-wayfaring-men/

Secure enclave not so secure. "Intel HW is too complex to be absolutely secure! After years of research we finally extracted Intel SGX Fuse Key0, AKA Root Provisioning Key. Together with FK1 or Root Sealing Key (also compromised), it represents Root of Trust for SGX. Here's the key from a genuine Intel CPU😀" Source:

X (formerly Twitter)

Mark Ermolov (@_markel___) on X

Intel HW is too complex to be absolutely secure! After years of research we finally extracted Intel SGX Fuse Key0, AKA Root Provisioning Key. Toget...

One of the strange things to understand, which was not seen by many people until arrest of Telegram's CEO is the regulatory capture of big-social(tm). Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, etc. are not arrested by French cops, because they comply, at least with the governments that have hard power. Imagine you run a platform for chat, or social media network and countries such as France, Uganda, Hungary, Ecuador, USA, Great Britain, constantly spam you with some weird requests. Unless you have a team of hundreds of people following some strange requests from countries you probably never heard of, you are "non-cooperating" and go to jail. One way to solve this is to encrypt, another is to decentralize and don't run any infrastructure. Signal is doing the encryption route. Want me to investigate this group? Sorry, I don't know what the group is, I don't even see its name. I don't know who's a member. No, I don't know what they are chatting about. I can't remove the content, because I don't know what content belongs to it. Nostr is doing it the decentralization route. "Sorry, we are authors of the user interface, we do not store any messages, go talk to the relay operators, here's a list" (pastes a list of top 1000 relays, silently runs nostrsync to copy the content everywhere, so the police have more fun). SimpleX and Keet are doing it both ways. In SimpleX case, relays can be run by anyone (and it's encrypted). In Keet, there are no relays, it's peer to peer. It is not only about showing middle finger to the government (and in some cases, it might be just and good do cooperate), but it is also about avoiding regulatory capture by big-tech - you can cooperate easily by saying "sorry, not our infrastructure" or "sorry, we would like to tell you about this user/message, but we don't know anything about it, it's encrypted". This regulatory capture is everywhere. Try to publish a simple app in the app stores and you will be constantly bombarded by e-mails such as "taxation in Uganda / India has changed, here's what you need to do". Really? I have a calculator app.

Just listened to this 8 hour Neuralink episode. It might not be fun for all of you, so it's not a general recommendation, but to me it was fascinating. First about how the technology including robotic surgery works, but mainly about the weirdness of controlling something with your brain. I have spent hundreds, maybe more than a thousand hours on some sort of EEG brain computer interface, so I got plenty of training. The resolution of these is not perfect, but you can do many things even with an EEG device. What is interesting is that I am controlling things that have no analog in the motor cortex, I am changing my state of mind and focus, which is very different to moving (or attempting to move, or imagining to move - three different things as per the podcast) a finger. The brain does not have direct receptors about its internal state. The brain does not hurt. The EEG feedback adds this information and it's possible to train doing completely new things with the brain. The interesting fact is that even when I learn it to some extent, I can't really tell how it works - or what exactly I do. I call it surfing on the wave all the way down, but it's something that you would not be able to replicate without figuring it out yourself. We can only have shared vocabulary after you experienced it . This I believe is precisely why it's hard to explain psychedelic experience to someone who has never experienced it. You might describe the visual part (which is not shared - I don't do the visual part at all actually, even when I dream, it's never visual. I know the concepts, the structures, but I don't see it), but that's only because that's the common ground ("I have seen beautiful fractals") and probably the least interesting part of the experience. Why I'm describing this? It's very hard to explain that there are things you can learn to do with your brain that we don't even have good words for. I believe brain computer interfaces with technologies like neurofeedback will make learning it much easier than for example meditation. Combining the dedication of meditation practice with the boost of neurofeedback is the best I believe. But most of you don't even understand what I'm talking about, because you never experienced it. It's out there. https://fountain.fm/episode/YuR0YvrA3JyOXHRiE13r