Segwit was absolutely going to activate. Prior to that actually happening some unknowable but small amount of economic nodes deployed a UASF (like BIP110) that would have caused themselves to be forked off of BTC *before* segwit activation (like BIP110). In order to prevent this pointless disruption, BIP91 was introduced as a way to coordinate earlier miner signaling of Segwit. Then of course we had to listen to a decade of UASF nonsense, which was also the reason Taproot was significantly delayed, finally being activated after the UASF route was fully rejected. So the "historical fact" is that BIP148 was irrelevant, and BIP91 allowed them to save face. And they’ve been abusing that gift ever since. And now we are going to see what happens when a UASF actually activates.

That only works in the short term while bitcoiners don't produce and of the goods and services in the economy.

If bitcoin could be stopped by governments it would be worth $0

Bitcoin is not easy to shut down.

Who remembers the anarchist cookbook?

Running Bitcoin Core v25.0.0

Unpopular opinion: NIPS don't matter because you don't read them anyway.

We've decided to revalue bitcoin back to 26k in order to wipe out all the leverage and reset everything to a healthy base.

North Korea has a higher birth rate than South Korea. China has a birth rate higher than Taiwan. All they need to do is not get dragged into a war and they win.

Who's using GLM5.2?