chovy

Hey nostr! I’ve launched ETH Shot, a simple, provably-fair jackpot game that now runs on Ethereum mainnet. It’s designed to be fun, transparent, and easy to play, while also serving as a lightweight example of on-chain gaming. How it works: Connect your wallet to Ethereum mainnet. Each “shot” costs 0.0005 ETH. You have a 1% chance to win the entire pot. If you win, you instantly receive 90% of the pot. The other 10% supports the platform. There’s a 1-hour cooldown between shots per wallet. Why it’s interesting: It’s fully transparent—every action is handled by verifiable smart contracts. It’s open source and lightweight—under 80 lines of Solidity with a Svelte frontend. It updates in real time with pot size, leaderboards, referral bonuses, sponsor rounds, and celebratory animations. Why it matters: It’s an easy, low-cost way to explore blockchain-based gaming with real ETH. It’s a great example for developers interested in on-chain randomness, gas optimization, and game design. It’s permissionless—anyone can review or contribute to the code. How to try it: Connect your wallet to Ethereum mainnet. Visit ethshot.io. Take your shot, check the leaderboard, and share feedback or open GitHub issues. I’d love to hear from the community: Should the 1% win rate change based on pot size or activity? How’s the onboarding flow and UI? Any suggestions for improving fairness or gameplay? Let’s make this a fun way to play, test, and maybe win some real ETH.

would there be any interest in a p2p messaging app, using a web3 wallet for authentication and sending messages? I'm not sure what it would charge for but it would use ipfs to store the messages in encrypted format.

what is Yakonni?

On July 18, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a radical and unprecedented restructuring, resulting in the complete elimination of its Office of Research and Development (ORD), the agency's cornerstone for scientific research and expertise. This move, orchestrated under Administrator Lee Zeldin, involves firing hundreds of scientists, including chemists, biologists, toxicologists, and other specialists who have been instrumental in guiding the nation's environmental policies for decades. The Office of Research and Development has long functioned as the scientific backbone of the EPA, conducting essential research across ten national laboratories. Its mission included critical areas such as air and water quality, toxicology, chemical risk assessments, and environmental cleanup operations. Historically, the ORD has provided vital scientific support during environmental disasters, significantly influencing policy-making and regulatory decisions aimed at protecting public health and safety. In place of the ORD, the EPA has proposed the creation of a new entity, dubbed the "Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions." According to Administrator Zeldin, this restructuring is intended to streamline operations by focusing on practical, applied solutions rather than purely academic or long-term research. Research responsibilities previously centralized in the ORD will now be dispersed among the agency’s specialized program offices focused on air quality, water safety, and toxic substances. Critics, however, argue this fragmentation may lead to inefficiencies, weakening the agency’s ability to manage integrated environmental threats. This drastic change follows months of internal and external speculation, despite repeated denials by EPA leadership that any such radical restructuring was forthcoming. Many staff within the agency were blindsided by the announcement, leading to accusations of a deliberate lack of transparency. Some analysts interpret this development as part of a broader political agenda aligned with former President Trump’s deregulatory approach. Administrator Zeldin, a close ally of Trump, has previously declared intentions to slash the agency’s budget by nearly 65% and reverse significant environmental regulations, calling this restructuring "the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history." The dismantling of the ORD raises immediate and pressing concerns over the nation’s preparedness for environmental emergencies. For instance, ORD scientists played a pivotal role during major crises like Hurricane Harvey in 2017, delivering swift and scientifically informed responses critical for recovery efforts. Experts fear the dissolution of the ORD could severely compromise the EPA’s capacity for rapid response in future environmental disasters, potentially exacerbating health and environmental damage. Further concerns center on the regulatory ramifications of dismantling the ORD. Historically, the office has been central to establishing National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and overseeing management plans for Superfund sites. Without the cohesive scientific infrastructure and interdisciplinary collaboration previously provided by ORD, the EPA’s ability to enforce rigorous environmental regulations could be significantly diminished. Critics argue this restructuring represents a move away from evidence-based policy-making toward a model that prioritizes industrial convenience and cost-cutting over public health. Another significant issue raised is the potential loss of institutional knowledge. Decades of accumulated scientific data, expertise, and long-term studies face disruption or abandonment. Environmental advocates emphasize that fragmented research spread across specialized offices risks losing critical synergies and undermines comprehensive environmental health programs. Programs such as the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), vital for assessing health risks from toxic chemicals, may now struggle without the focused oversight and continuity the ORD provided. Moreover, the legal implications of this restructuring have drawn fierce opposition from lawmakers and environmental activists. Federal statutes mandate that the EPA employ the "best available science" in decision-making processes. Many legal experts, including members of the House Science Committee, have argued the outright elimination of the ORD contravenes these legal obligations. Representative Zoe Lofgren, a leading Democrat on the committee, explicitly labeled the move "illegal," suggesting that the agency’s new structure might not withstand legal scrutiny. These statements hint at looming congressional investigations and potential lawsuits designed to block or delay the restructuring. The EPA’s internal culture has already shown signs of strain. Prior to this announcement, the agency had suspended over a hundred employees who openly opposed administration policies or participated in dissenting activities. The elimination of the ORD will likely deepen internal divisions, erode morale, and potentially drive talented scientists away from federal service. Such talent drains could have lasting impacts on the EPA’s ability to attract future scientific expertise, further jeopardizing its long-term capabilities. Observers have noted that this restructuring continues a troubling trend seen across other federal agencies under similar political pressures. Institutions such as NASA, NOAA, and the USDA have faced comparable budget cuts, layoffs, and scientific interference in recent years. This widespread erosion of scientific capacity has profound implications for public trust in federal institutions and the United States' role as a global leader in environmental and climate research. Internationally, the dismantling of the ORD could diminish America's credibility in environmental governance. The EPA has historically set global benchmarks for rigorous scientific standards and environmental protections. Weakening the agency’s scientific infrastructure risks undermining U.S. influence in international environmental policy negotiations, at a time when global cooperation on issues like climate change remains critical. In response to the announced layoffs and restructuring, significant backlash from scientific communities, environmental advocacy groups, and lawmakers is expected. Protest actions, legal challenges, and congressional hearings could dominate headlines in the coming months. Environmental groups have already begun mobilizing, planning to leverage public opinion and judicial mechanisms to contest the agency’s decision. Ultimately, the decision to dismantle the EPA’s Office of Research and Development signals a profound shift in the agency’s approach to environmental regulation. By sidelining robust, centralized scientific research in favor of fragmented and applied studies, the EPA risks undermining its foundational mission to safeguard environmental health and public safety. While proponents of the restructuring claim efficiency and practical results, the potential long-term damage to the nation’s environmental resilience and scientific integrity remains a grave concern. As layoffs begin, the EPA faces a turbulent transition period. Scientists, advocacy groups, and congressional critics are expected to continue pushing back vigorously, potentially shaping not only the future structure of the EPA but also broader conversations about the role of science in federal governance. The outcome of this battle may set critical precedents for future environmental policy and scientific independence within U.S. federal agencies. #EPA #SciencePolicy #EnvironmentalProtection #LeeZeldin #PublicHealth #ClimateCrisis #EnvironmentalJustice #ResearchIntegrity #Regulation #FederalGovernance

nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj76twvfhhstnjv4kxz7tn9ekxzmny9uq35amnwvaz7tms09exzmtfvshxv6tpw34xze3wvdhk6tcqyqalp33lewf5vdq847t6te0wvnags0gs0mu72kz8938tn24wlfze6luf5tq hey, what's an easy way for a dummy to run their own lightning node on a linux server? I tried umbrel but its not really working in docker for me.

Developers, builders, and code enthusiasts—I'm excited to announce the launch of a new subreddit: r/codeforcrypto! This community is designed specifically for software engineers, developers, and coders who prefer to get paid in crypto. Whether you're building crypto-specific projects, open-source tools, websites, mobile apps, AI-driven services, or just solving interesting technical challenges—this is your place. We welcome projects of all types—not just blockchain-related. The key idea: connecting coders who believe in the power of cryptocurrency and want to earn or pay in crypto for their work. If you've ever thought about freelancing or hiring talent using Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other digital currencies, come join us. Share your latest creations, collaborate on exciting new ventures, find your next gig, or just discuss ideas with like-minded developers. Let's foster a vibrant, open community that empowers devs to truly own the value of their work, without relying on traditional payment systems. Check it out, join today, and let's build something incredible together: 👉 https://reddit.com/r/codeforcrypto #SoftwareDevelopment #Cryptocurrency #OpenSource #Freelancing #Web3 #Developers #RemoteWork

I bought my first #Bitcoin at $4. Yes, four dollars. It was a different time, almost impossible to imagine today. Crypto was raw, exciting, and uncharted territory. I was early, but like many early adopters, I learned some hard lessons along the way. One of those lessons cost me dearly: I lost 33 BTC when my seed phrase was compromised. At today's valuation, that's hundreds of thousands of dollars gone in a heartbeat. A painful lesson in security, custody, and personal responsibility. It stung. Badly. But it also shaped me. Instead of giving up, I doubled down—on educating myself, diversifying strategies, and finding smarter ways to invest. Now, my approach is more disciplined, structured, and secure. Today, I invest in Bitcoin through a self-directed IRA. It’s a far cry from the wild west days of crypto, but it lets me invest confidently, securely, and strategically. Tax efficiency and peace of mind are the new goals. My crypto journey started at $4 Bitcoin, had highs, lows, devastating losses, and ultimately, growth. Crypto isn’t just an investment, it’s an education. Stay safe. Stay smart. Keep learning. #Bitcoin #CryptoInvesting #CryptoIRA #FinancialEducation #LessonsLearned #Cryptocurrency #DigitalAssets #SecurityFirst

New Velocity Vibe album coming soon: https://github.com/profullstack/music/tree/master/Velocity%20Vibe/Reignition

Back in the '90s, landing a job often came down to just two things—a resume and a phone call. If the conversation clicked, you were hired. Simple, straightforward, and human. Today, I've embraced a similar approach—but with a modern twist. I skip overly complex interview processes and instead ask candidates one key question: "Can I see your GitHub?" This tells me what truly matters: your work, your passion, and your potential. Great hires aren’t about checking boxes or navigating hoops; they're about finding genuine talent, curiosity, and the ability to contribute meaningfully. Keep it authentic, keep it transparent, keep it about the work. #Hiring #Recruitment #GitHub #DeveloperLife #SoftwareEngineering #TechHiring #Innovation #CareerAdvice

[HIRING] VP of Sales (Web Development Agency) @ Profullstack, Inc. 🚀 We're a distributed, remote-first team of engineers and designers looking for a sales rockstar to help land web development and MVP contracts. You'll earn a generous 10% commission on every deal you close (typical projects range from $20k-$150k). Our specialty: helping non-technical founders build out their MVPs using our custom tech stack. Sound like you? Shoot us a DM!

#jobs https://grazily.com

#podcasts https://bytebroadcast.com/

https://bytebroadcast.com/ #nostr

#nostr https://bytebroadcast.com/