Many people hate this topic but I think it is important.
In trying to get the word out on NOSTR, is it important to explain the history of the WWW/Internet. Interesting enough, the guy who bridged a major gap was Marc Andreessen with his work on the Netscape Browser (before IE/Chrome.) Marc has been incredible with what he has accomplished, browser, cloud computing. However, recently there was a huge public blow up between Dorsey and AndreessenHorowitz (a16z is how Andreessen wants to be known).
It comes down to one rambling sentence for me.
I can't believe people don't see the frustration/vision/passion of Dorsey when he is\was sounding the alarm on VCs like a16z and how their money/direction poisons true decentralization of the Web. (Never mind VCs $upport other poisonous Altcoins. VCs are there to make money and that is not decentralization.)
The only decentralized Social Protocol: NOSTR
The only decentralized Digital Property: Bitcoin
Why don't more people listen to Dorsey and reject the money grubbing VCs/Banks who continue to ruin true worldwide decentralization and innovation.
With 'the people' creating 'the content' getting 'the money.'
Your beautiful vision continues unfolding Jack. Thanks Jack. People will laugh someday, "Twitter/Meta/Google didn't pay you for your content you spent hours working on as they profited not you?"
<snip>
1) web1 (Centralized) = First iteration of the WWW, "Read Only" or static pages, much like the old days of Time/Life Magazine, you were shown what you could see. (e.g. AOL)
2) web2 (Centralized) = Where we are today, things went from reading to contributing. Here is where the term "Content is King" was introduced. It is still controlled by a select few, (e.g. Google, Meta, Twitter, blogging, podcasts). The companies own the Internet.
3) web3 (Decentralized?) = There is controversy here but the premise is the content providers will be rewarded for their efforts, not those hosting their platforms. The people sort of own the Internet?
4) web5 (Decentralized) = web5 is controversial but it was explained by Jack Dorsey early on why web3 is inferior. The premise between web3 and web5 are the same, reward the content providers, with micropayments. (Dorsey: Goodbye "Likes and Number of Followers", hello Satoshis/Sats.)
But web5 NOSTR isn't a platform but a protocol See Snowden's description at the bottom of this. There is debate on how these projects will be funded, hopefully thoroughly vetted if VCs are in the mix.
The most promising are funding projects/Bounties on Bounstr.org)*****
<snip>
https://bitcoinapolis.blogspot.com/2023/03/bitcoin-dorseys-web5-is-here-layering.html
======
a16z explained:
AndreessenHorowitz
A + 16 Characters Above + Z = a16z (clever)