User's avatar
npub16d8g...4rzv
sovereigncommunityinfrastructure@librepyramid.libretechsystems.xyz
npub16d8g...4rzv
Welcome to Our Bitcoin Store We are a small, passionate team dedicated to providing quality Bitcoin-focused tools and accessories. Our current offerings include: Bitcoin wallets Seed storage plates Nostr signing devices ESP32 miners 3D-printed cases and hardware Satscards & Boltzcards As we grow, so will our inventory and expertise in serving you. If you're interested in any of our products, please feel free to inquire about shipping. Thank you for your support! ⚡ Onchain Ecash Layer-2 Liquid Accepted ☆.𓋼𓍊 𓆏 𓍊𓋼𓍊.☆ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣄⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢀⣠⣿⣿⠟⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣥⣄⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣧ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿ ⢰⣶⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣾⣿⣿⠿⠛⠁ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Coding with a rubber duck might yield better results than with advanced AI
Holding a strong opinion is of no use if you don’t constantly question it with your own writing
In the mechanism of the universe , damnation is tied to celestial machines
Human-AI Collaboration with Misaligned Preferences Jiaxin Song, Parnian Shahkar, Kate Donahue, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury Citation - arXiv:2511.02746 [cs.GT] In many real-life settings, algorithms play the role of assistants, while humans ultimately make the final decision. Often, algorithms specifically act as curators, narrowing down a wide range of options into a smaller subset that the human picks between: consider content recommendation or chatbot responses to questions with multiple valid answers. Crucially, humans may not know their own preferences perfectly either, but instead may only have access to a noisy sampling over preferences. Algorithms can assist humans by curating a smaller subset of items, but must also face the challenge of misalignment: humans may have different preferences from each other (and from the algorithm), and the algorithm may not know the exact preferences of the human they are facing at any point in time. In this paper, we model and theoretically study such a setting. Specifically, we show instances where humans benefit by collaborating with a misaligned algorithm. Surprisingly, we show that humans gain more utility from a misaligned algorithm (which makes different mistakes) than from an aligned algorithm. Next, we build on this result by studying what properties of algorithms maximize human welfare, when the goals could be either utilitarian welfare or ensuring all humans benefit. We conclude by discussing implications for designers of algorithmic tools and policymakers. https://cdn.satellite.earth/859216c98a89a025c9b7c3269c5b5e056243fa4a9d12e18b50e5bccb71379d4c.pdf
Actively supporting the security and integrity of the Bitcoin protocol through community involvement is essential to the long-term success of Bitcoin.