What is the best Clark Kent/Superman combo in live action?
I mean both personas done very well, not just one.
I'd say Christopher Reeve. And then Tyler Hoechlin as a close close second.
Coincidentally (or not) both with very good Lois Lane.
Diego Gurpegui
_@diegogurpegui.com
npub168nq...926e
https://diegogurpegui.com
PGP: 3158 9B9F 61CF B747 1892 493B C250 54EC D301 37A4
Usual nostr client praise: Amethyst is really good. One of the fastest and smoothest clients I tried. And keeps adding small improvement here and there.
Kudos #[0] and contributors
La "Tecnología Blockchain" tiene mala fama (en ciertos grupos) porque se la asocia a humo o estafa. Yo creo que la "Tecnología Blockchain" en realidad es excelente. El punto, para mi, es que el caso de uso que la justifica es acotado: Bitcoin.
Unos casos de uso creo que no tienen sentido, otros los encuentro con problemas, y otros me hacen pensar "por que no usar Bitcoin para esto?".
El ingenio humano es poderoso y puede aparecer algo que no veo aún, pero hoy creo que la tecnología no es el problema, sino los supuestos usos.
Nota 1: Hablo de "Tecnología Blockchain" para salir de las definiciones simplistas como "es sólo una base de datos blabla". Me refiero a la tecnología de timestamping distribuido de TXs firmadas con generación de bloques secuenciales de forma costosa, etc....
Nota 2: Dicho esto, me gusta que se pruebe todo y se experimente. De eso se trata una tecnología abierta, y así funciona el progreso. Aunque preferiría que mucho de ese esfuerzo fuera a proyectos con más sentido :)
What a great book "The Sovereign Individual" (by James Dale Davidson & Lord William Rees-Mogg).
Reading it now and it being written in 1997 is even more fascinating.
Regarding browser addon for signing Nostr messages:
Is it worth it to have a manual approval each time you have to sign something? I'm thinking of a PIN or even a password.
The idea is that the private key is stored encrypted without the extension to know the encryption key. So each time you need to sign something you, the user, need to enter that encryption key. It could be in the form of a PIN or a password, which you have to enter every time.
Does it make sense? is it too much?
GitHub discussion here:

GitHub
Improving security with manual approval code for each sign? · Issue #11 · diegogurpegui/nos2x-fox
Is it worth it to have a manual approval each time you have to sign something? I'm thinking of a PIN or even a password. The idea is that the priva...
There has been a few updates in nos2x-fox (the Firefox add-on for signing Nostr messages, and fork of "nos2x") in the past month.
Some are:
- Configure your preferred relays
- Allow your authorization to sites last for 5 min, 1 hour or 8 hours (with possibility of revoking)
- Better display of the message you are signing
- Support for both hexa and nsec/npub format for your keys
- Many UI improvements and fixes
Install from Firefox Add-ons page:
Or check the repo and download the XPI to install by yourself:


nos2x-fox – Get this Extension for 🦊 Firefox (en-US)
Download nos2x-fox for Firefox. Nostr Signer Extension (for Firefox)
GitHub
GitHub - diegogurpegui/nos2x-fox: nostr signer extension for Firefox
nostr signer extension for Firefox. Contribute to diegogurpegui/nos2x-fox development by creating an account on GitHub.
Is there any app for Android that works as a cryptography toolbox? Where you can encrypt/decrypt content choosing and customizing cipher algorithms.
Something like 

cryptii
Modular conversion, encoding and encryption online
Web app offering modular conversion, encoding and encryption online. Translations are done in the browser without any server interaction. This is a...