Das Kombinat ist zurück

😂 🤣 😂

GM, fren.

🤣 🤣 🤣

GM, fren.

NATO will not die honorably on the battlefield. Do it!

Kollaps der NATO unter Trump? „Müssen anfangen, das Undenkbare zu denken“

Kirill with an 8-year delta Checkmate

Central bankers getting bent 😂

GM, fren.

When the EU still thought things couldn't get any worse. 🤣

Hello! Wake up! It's always state terrorism.

Nows your chance Putin please take out Satoshi. We will shed no tears 😂

GM, fren.

J Powell stock plummet is imminent

Source:

X (formerly Twitter)

BurningBright (@reBurningBright) on X

Donald Trump’s New Pax Americana Is a Take It or Leave It Deal ... Power is Power. Not rules. Not norms. Not the hollow incantations of a "Rule...

Donald Trump’s New Pax Americana Is a Take It or Leave It Deal ... Power is Power. Not rules. Not norms. Not the hollow incantations of a "Rules-Based International Order" that spent decades pretending its edicts carried weight independent of the fist that once—willingly or not—enforced them. And Donald Trump, in the opening salvos of his second term, is reminding every layer of the collective battlespace—from the streets of Caracas to the chancelleries of Europe, from the palaces of Tehran to the frozen expanses of Greenland—that rules do not project power. Power projects rules. And the story he is telling is so unapologetically raw, so deliberately theatrical that it demands attention from every observer, regardless of allegiance or worldview, and somewhat shockingly, regardless of which layer of reality you're operating on. Observe the whispered and now shouted narrative of American "super soldiers" executing a regime-change raid on Nicolás Maduro with the casual dominance of gods descending upon mortals. Eyewitness accounts—amplified, not denied by the White House itself—paint a picture almost too cinematic to credit, yet too detailed to dismiss outright by those who believe, if not everything they're told in the central narrative, then at least the baseline that surely SOMETHING they're being told must be true. Elite Delta operators, moving through Caracas under the cover of perfect night. Swarms of autonomous drones silencing radar arrays without a trace. Non-lethal sonic emitters that rupture sinuses, burst eardrums and induce immediate surrender. Precision fire that drops hundreds of regime loyalists while leaving the twenty American avatars untouched. And for narrative purposes (and plot-based convenience, of course,) a surviving Venezuelan guard, voice trembling in interviews that spread like wildfire across every platform, describing the scene with the haunted reverence of a man who has witnessed the future of war. Whether one adopts the Bicameral Mindset—viewing this as the latest in the midst of a series of layered narrative deployments with minimal kinetic actuals—or whether fragments of operational truth bleed through the story layer, the translation remains identical, as do its net effects. The United States can reach into the heart of your regime, extract or eliminate its head and leave your security apparatus shattered—all while projecting zero vulnerability. The comes the bureaucratic follow-up, with the State Department issuing an urgent advisory for all American citizens to depart Venezuela immediately. What could have been a routine evacuation order on its surface, when augmented by the emergent super-soldier mythos and the translated 'actual' of the Maduro Regime Change that was decidedly NOT the Regime Change we were told it was grants the entire theater a crucial sheen of verisimilitude, my favorite word in life and in the Info War. Suddenly, the cartoonish becomes credible. The narrative gains teeth. And teeth, once bared, change the calculus of every observer, and most crucially, every would-be actor. Cuba—for decades propped up by Venezuelan oil subsidies and security patronage—wakes to find themselves the targets of Trump's latest narrative deployment. The message is being delivered to whichever regime would operate behind the public-facing one, warning the shadowy apparatus to get in line like we're told Venezuela has (with the Maduro Regime still completely intact,) and as Colombia soon followed. Iran, meanwhile watches its own streets convulse under the compounded pressures of economic collapse and popular fury. Or so we're told, though the difference between organic uprising and globalist-funded color revolution can be difficult to trace these days. And into this crucible arrives word that the new American President is already receiving detailed briefings—kinetic and non-kinetic options for intervention should the Ayatollah turn the Revolutionary Guard loose on the people while the Supreme Leader rages against "arrogant powers," threats that falter under the shadow of what credible narrative projection now implies in the realm of the real. Even our so-called allies—the architects and beneficiaries of the old order Trump is in the midst of dismantling—find themselves on the receiving end of a refrain that should be old hat to them with how long Vladimir Putin has been training them according to its tenets. Greenland, strategic linchpin in the Arctic coveted by Trump since his first term for its position astride Russian and Chinese ambitions is a potential flashpoint in the emergence of the new Pax Americana that is as logical as it is shocking to the calcified western psyche, long rooted in its post-war paradigm. So, while the Danish Prime Minister issues a grave public warning that any American move to seize the island would "destroy NATO," behind closed doors, the Europeans—UK, Germany and France—scramble to assemble a counter-proposal: a multinational NATO Arctic force ... anything to appease the American sovereign before he makes good on promises that once sounded like bluster and now look like anything but. This is an actual cascade of rapidly shifting geopolitics and posturing all aligning around the new projected and actualizing American era, and all it took was one story whose actuals could be debated until the end of time. The translation is universal: even the institutions built to constrain American power now react with the instinctive deference of entities that remember, deep in their foundational coding, who ultimately underwrote their existence. Power is Power. I've been arguing this since my foundational series, Righteous Russia. And in this deliberate reminder, Trump does not stand alone. He mirrors—whether by design, convergence or sovereign parallelism—the public postures long adopted by Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Russia has spent years demonstrating, through action on its engineered borderlands and restraint elsewhere that without the credible threat of American kinetic projection, the globalist machine is hollow. Sanctions become paper. Alliances dissolve. Narratives of moral superiority ring empty when unbacked by force. Meanwhile, China flexes in the South China Sea and along its borders, translating the same lesson: rules without enforcing power are mere suggestions, politely ignored. And BOTH leaders (who represent two of three pillars of my long-theorized Sovereign Alliance, with Trump as the third,) are now operating in a macro narrative environment wherein Regime Change is back on the menu, and decidedly against the interests of those who wrote the book on it. Far from hurtling the world toward open war, this shared refrain from the Sovereign Trinity—Power is Power—lays the foundation for a multipolar peace unlike any the modern era has witnessed, perhaps unlike any in recorded history. That is, of course if you operate under the logical and increasingly-proven premise that none of the three sovereign leaders truly desires the apocalyptic waste of the global kinetic conflict the rules-based international order has long been planning. Instead, each seeks only the respect inherent in the respective spheres of influence that the Globalist Order was literally created to disrupt. Each seeks not to dominate the globe, but to secure his nation, his people and their interests. And yes, this move toward a multipolar paradigm is coordinated, which will become increasingly apparent as the era of treaties and pacts, organizations and unions evaporates or collapses under the weight of renewed and remembered sovereignty. In other words, the New World Order does not die in cataclysm or the fire they would have called down on the rest of us. It dies in the quiet, collective realization that its rules were always backed by borrowed power—power siphoned from sovereign peoples and projected outward to bind them. The collective story being told by these anti-collectivist leaders works, and will ultimately last because it recalls the oldest stories and THE first principles. Rules do not project power. Power projects rules. And that power is being reclaimed, one story at a time, whether you believe them or not.