What scary news. Who is in spraying those cameras? When a government is able to do criminal stuff, why should citizens not just do the same? View quoted note →

Thank you for sharing the article. I think it is very important to bring this topic to all big media outlets in the next month. Be it with publicity, influencers, niche media like podcasters reporting on it or whatever. There should be no EU parlamentarian, that does not see the great dangers of the new law. Day by day before the vote. Lets build up the pressure and bring up this topic. Bring it up in medias comment sections. View quoted note →

Play SRF

Q&A zur Reportage «Hype um Krypto – Was bringen Bitcoin und Co. den Jungen?» - rec. - Play SRF

Liebe Community, vielen Dank für die zahlreichen Kommentare zur Reportage «Hype um Krypto - Was bringen Bitcoin und Co. den Jungen?». Lugano wil...

Ein echt gutes Q&A folgend auf eine sehr Kritische Reportage zu #Luganos #PlanB Ist wichtig zu erwähnen, dass es sich um eine neugierige, vorsichtige Journalistin handelt, welche hier ihre ersten Berührungspunkte mit Bitcoin gemacht hat. Der vorangehende Bericht konzentriert sich daher noch eher auf die sorgen und kritischen stimmen. Ich denke aber im Q&A wird ein ausgewogene Repräsentation gezeigt, welcher das Potenzial und die usecases von Bitcoin aufzeigt.

#USA #history #trump #vance #totalitarian #orvellian Today I started reading the following article thinking: "What could be so critical about national park rangers?" But when I heared, that Donald Trump orders historic museums, rangers and other representatives of US-history, to silence all parts that could potentially devide US-citizen, it was instantly clear, why this is a hot topic. Not a single representative Ranger would have an interview with their real name, since they fear to loose their job on every critical mention against the current US government. I hope all the people, which emphasized the importance of #freedomofspeech, when JD Vance was speaking in europe are as alerted as they were back then. Whoever stays silence and accepts such a regime is part of the orwellian regime. Lets show the strength of #nostr to the world when it is most needed. Lets bring those #rangers to nostr to speak up in anonymity. Write the silenced history in longform posts, Wikipedia and other worldwide storages, before some of those stories are lost for ever. This is a time to defent public knowledge from a government that openly denies the nations history.

#asknostr Is Nostr search a resolved problem? Please help me to learn about good nostr search solutions. Thanks a lot.

Medium

7 Essential Principles of Zettelkasten

7 Essential Principles of Zettelkasten In a time when information is everywhere, the Zettelkasten method stands out as a powerful tool for effectiv...

Maby just a reminder to check out #zettelkasten. A great system to connect thoughts, to make sense of the world with your personal perspective. Nostr probably is kind of a huge interconnected Zettelkasten. Even when it is still very hard to find stuff. For me at least.

Wie lange wird es wohl dauern bis die #schweizer #nationalbank (#SNB) ihre Aussagen zu Bitcoin von Ablehnung zu Zustimmung anpasst? Die FED ist weltweit schon oft taktgebend. Würde mich erstaunen, wenn es bei Bitcoin anders wäre. View quoted note →

Prefer critique, before good feelings. Since when your certainty is only based in the lack of critique, it is vulnerable anyway. #critique #philosophy

I just thought about the controvercy of #security and #opensource. These are quiet contrarian concepts. Digital security makes sure, stored information is only accessible to a defined circle of people, while opensource has the goal that everyone has access to given information. I concluded, that opensource contributors are individuals, which care more about the common good then about individual privilege. They gift their knowledge to everyone to improve chance equality. On the other side, individuals which try to protect their innovations with security, privacy and intellectual property laws, prefer individual privilege over the common good. Therefore they put as much hurdles to the spread of their knowledge, so they can make profits from their knowledge advantage. As newer an innovation is, as easier it is to hold it private and protected. And over time more and more competitors will make their best to come up to speed with the most innovative product. And once too many companies and individuals understood a profitable concept, the innovation will eventually converge into opensource knowledge. I think it is never a question if some innovation will be opensourced. The question is only when this will happen.

This seems very concerning. A nation state has to invest far too much money to hack every citizens phone with expensive 0-day exploits. But it is far more feasable to just target cirical journalists. Quiete a low effort to spy them and make sure journalists have a hard time to make public, what is done with the peoples tax money. Therefore no democratic heart or brain on this earth could want that journalists are targeted by state surveillance. Since they are a very rare primary resource for transparency, where it is needed. No democracy without the freedom of the press. View quoted note →

Great article. Thank you for sharing. When #privacy matters to you, check if you can lower your surface by only enabling signals, when actually used. ;) View quoted note →

Thanks @Jordan S For your question I came for myself to a very simple universal definition of fair: 1. All participants can enter and exit freely. 2. All participants have transparent access to all rules. 3. Cheating can not be more profitable than playing along the rules.