watson.ch

Interne Dokumente zeigen: Israelische Armee tötet in Gaza mehrheitlich Zivilisten

Israelische Armee-Daten zeigen: 83 Prozent der Toten in Gaza sind Zivilisten. Laut Kritikern übertreibt Netanjahu Opferzahlen von Hamas-Kämpfern ...

in einer Recherche haben Generäle aus der israelischen Armee mitgeteilt, dass wohl um die 83% der getöteten Personen zivilisten sind. Es wurde bestätigt, dass Netanjahu wissentlich falsche Zahlen (um die 20k anstatt 9k) der getöteten Hamas veröffentlicht. Ähnlich hohe zivilve Verluste konnten nur in 3 anderen Kriegen festgestellt werden. Das sindder Völkermord in Ruanda 1994, der Angriff auf Mariupol 2022 und das Massaker von Srebrenica während des Bosnien-Kriegs.

First youtube short I really like 😂

Speechless 😂 View quoted note →

Thanks for sharing. Some politicions really act as if no one was looking. Where is all the shame gone? View quoted note →

Thank you very much for this great longform article. Really a great read. I would say the information revolution has the power to change a lot. 1. Never as many people could read as today. 2. More people are connected to the internet. 3. Open resources to educate are getting better (take all the kurzgesagt videos or TED talks freely available as an example) 4. I agree that within history Democracy is an anomaly and Anarchy has been mostly destroeyed and effectifely defamed by horrible narratives. 5. Current circumstances of several houndred millions of people living in free societies paired with a lot of tendencies of growing surveillance could be a great catalysator for groundbreaking spread of anarchistic ideas to spread. Maby we are at a great time of humanity where we can create anarchistic subcultures which oppose authoritarian tendencies and grow slowly but consistently. Maby we can sustain the growth through education and analysis of suthoritarian states to stimulate the investments. View article →

Have you ever thought, that facts can not be objectively positive or negative? You as an individual interpret them as good, bad or "doesn't matter". And you do this rationally or emotionally. When more than 50% of the facts you hear, you get an angle to think positively about it, you can consider yourself an optimist. When it is less a pessimist. And when most does not matter to you, maby check your empathy. But it does not make you any more realist, when you are more pessimistic or optimistic. A realist is only a person that bases his worldview and opinion on facts.

#amethyst stoped working for me @Vitor Pamplona I see only spam from users I am not following since the newest update. Why should any note be displayed that is not from a user I follow?

#corruption Many think, when someones action hurts everyone, I do not have to defend it. Like when someone litters trash in front of my eyes to the street. Since it is the same bad for everyone who walk along the street. But to make our society sustainable, we have to take every action personally, which is bad for us. Since when we do a lot of people stand together to defend public good. While a small number of people who do walk against public good are easy to handle. This is nothing against personal freedom. But against antisocial behaviour. Sometimes we have to learn to defend public good as if it is personal good. Since we are part of society also every public park is part of our space...