#corruption
Many think, when someones action hurts everyone, I do not have to defend it. Like when someone litters trash in front of my eyes to the street. Since it is the same bad for everyone who walk along the street. But to make our society sustainable, we have to take every action personally, which is bad for us. Since when we do a lot of people stand together to defend public good. While a small number of people who do walk against public good are easy to handle.
This is nothing against personal freedom. But against antisocial behaviour. Sometimes we have to learn to defend public good as if it is personal good. Since we are part of society also every public park is part of our space...
freemymind 🇨🇭
freemymind@NostrAddress.com
npub1kl8e...u2uq
#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence
How to learn my philosophy:
Start with some critical thinking on youtube with "TEDed the deomon of reason" miniseries
Start with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read "happy" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it
Follow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger
On Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab
Chronically offended by The Beave 😎
#surveillance #power #totalitarian #hope
Everyone knows: Information is power.
So: more information ~ more power
So inherently, state surveillance does lead to a powerful institution.
Power can be used to go against criminals. But there is no clear incentive to use this power for this purpose only.
Inherently this power will always be used to defend or increase the power. This is following Niklas Luhmann's system theory.
So whoever is giving a company or a institution the private information willingly or unwillingly should have this thought active. It is very likely the power will be used to defend the power, while the incentives to use it against criminals is at most a hope.
Really nice. I think it is great for relay owners to get to decide what will be broadcasted over their relay.
View quoted note →
Ich verstehe sehr wohl, dass #Elsalvador über lange Zeit unter der Gangkriminalität litt. Ich bin mir bewusst, dass es dort mitunter wegen der Gangkriminalität die höchsten Mordraten Weltweit hatte.
Daher ist es bestimmt eine schwierige Aufgabe die Strassen sicher zu machen, welche auch einige Opfer fordern kann. Dass viele tausend Menschen aufs Mal in Haft gesteckt werden müssen und dabei wahrscheinlich wenige finanzielle Mittel zur Erbauung und Sicherung der Gefängnisse zur Verfürung stehen.
Jedoch habe ich kein Verständnis für die Unmenschlichen Haftbedingungen. Denn bei diesem Ausmass scheinen die Bedingungen nicht ein Mangel an Mittel, sondern ein aktiv gewählter Akt von der hand teuflischer Gefängnisarchitekten. Ich hoffe es gibt da bald möglichst eine verbesserung der Bedingungen für die lokale Gesellschaft und ihre Gefangenen. 🙏
Denn der jetztige Zustand ist weder für die Sicherheit, noch ökonomisch oder Menschlich nachhaltig. Polizisten und Gefängniswärter werden zu seelenlosen Bluthunden erzogen. Muss mir niemand erzählen, die Gesellschaft sei sicher vor denen, nur weil sie keine Tatoos tragen.


Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF)
«Cecot»-Gefängnis in El Salvador: Ex-US-Migranten packen aus
Eine BBC-Recherche offenbart die Haftbedingungen für aus den USA ausgeschaffte Venezolaner im Gefängnis in El Salvador.

Das Netz ist politisch
DNIP Briefing #38: Ingenieur:innen an die Macht! - Das Netz ist politisch
Die Redaktion präsentiert jeden Dienstag die Geschichten, die sie bewegt, aufgerüttelt oder zum Nachdenken angeregt hat.
#ch #schweiz #politik #opensource #unabhaengigkeit
Oder eine kurze Zusammenfassung in
im untersten Paragraphen.
Toll zu sehen, dass wenigstens erste Schritte gemacht werden um die Nutzung von Opensource Software zu prüfen. Ich hoffe wir können aus der Zivilbevölkerung und den Parlamenten den Druck und die Aufmerksamkeit darauf erhalten und stätig erhöhen. So werden wir den Wandel langsam aber sicher erreichen :D
Geschäft Ansehen

Das Netz ist politisch
Digitalpolitischer Blick ins Parlament (6/n) - Das Netz ist politisch
Mit dem sechsten digitalpolitischen Blick schauen wir auf die in der ersten Hälfte 2025 eingereichten oder behandelten Vorstösse in National- und...
"controlled by a small group of anonymous individuals who operate with little transparency or accountability." DePaço says.
How to be more transparent than Wikipedia in what changes are made for what reasons. I mean this is a lie of a person that did not invest into Wikipedias working obviously. Whoever reads through a history source of Wikipedia can see part for part when what was changed.
Yes correct mostly anonymous/pseudonymous (eighter linked to a IP-Address or an email). But there are very clear rules on what has to be referenced in Wikipedia to alter an article. When he is concerned, that the article to his person is not according to truth, he would rather bring up his proof and other arguments, what parts are wrong and correct them accordingly.
View quoted note →
Concerning. Isn't it?
View quoted note →
Very powerful quote ;)
View quoted note →
Haha too greate XD
View quoted note →
#asknostr #surveillance #surveillancecapitalism #degoogle
What Youtube alternatives do you use? Until now this is the last google service I could not live without. But with starting age control I am really strongly willing to turn my back on youtube (hopefully for ever)
Thanks for sharing this video. I hope many #iphone users will see these privacy improvements and make use of it when they want to.
View quoted note →
Thanks for sharing the threat of #britcard.
Hey #UK nostriches. Inform yourself and get active, when you feel individual freedom could be important to you and your society ;)
"Britain has a long and proud history of rejecting proposals for mandatory ID, and we should reject this one too." (38degrees article I referenced below)
View quoted note →
Can I see your BritCard? Downing Street looking to bring in app to crackdown on illegal immigration | Daily Mail Online
Senior No 10 figures are said to be examining proposals for a new BritCard which would display a person

38 Degrees
Reject plans for a mandatory BritCard (digital ID)
Sir Keir Starmer is considering a mandatory digital ID scheme called “BritCard” that would make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about ou...

The Decoder
Bekannter KI-Forscher Stuart Russell warnt: KI‑Hype könnte abrupt kollabieren
Der bekannte KI-Forscher Stuart Russell und andere warnen vor überzogenen Erwartungen an KI, die sie zum Teil selbst herbeigeführt haben.
Great to see, that #surveillance companies have no protection from the public eye, when it comes to their contracts with police departments. We have a right to know for how much public money they offer how much surveillance. No matter if it is a private company or a government developed tool.
View quoted note →
Just found this great ideas about exactly what I was writing before in a youtube video of a recent event before 8 month:
View quoted note →
#asknostr
Couldn't we make our private data part of intellectual property rights? And based on this restrict the legal use of personal information - like real Name, date of birth, insurance number, ID-number, domicil, IP-connection and more - to a absolute minimum? And whenever someone wats to store these data longer than a certain minimum (like maby 30 days), they would have to present an active personal subscription, where they pay this specific individual for the use of their data or present a way to offer granular acceptance and decline of certain data points for a specific usecase the user is requesting. Like using the date of birth, since the user requests that their followers know their birthday.
I know many business models will have to change a lot of their practices. Tracking companies can even loose their business model.
But it seems of high importance to me, in order that we can continue living in a free society.