I got shellacked in the 2000 tech bust. Later, having thought I learned that lesson, sold some of the best network effect companies for no other reason than to take "profits"; and in so doing left life-changing millions on the table in subsequent runups (MSFT, AMZN). By the time the GFC rolled around, I had red-pilled myself on the unbelievable corruption of the world's fiat monetary system. Back then it wasn't as widely understood as it is today (thanks to Bitcoin). Started slowly stacking gold/silver and not worrying about price. I didn't get hurt in the GFC (other than real estate value decline by 40%) and won't get hurt in the coming monetary reset.
I sleep well with neutral assets like Bitcoin that have no captured, corrupted, regulated, or greedy rug-pulling bankster counterparty. Highly recommended for mental well being as the sovereign debt crisis starts to get real and the establishment starts shrieking that something must be done (to stoke more inflation).
We are ready. Do your worst.
Edmond Dantes⚡
npub1kdp9...c3nr
Separate money and state, for all else is a distraction. Government-owned strategic Bitcoin reserves and (stolen) sovereign wealth funds are antithetical to freedom. Bitcoin treasury companies are mostly scams. I follow Diogenes, Epictetus, Rothbard, and Satoshi.
Sprin
gtime in the Northern Rockies.
gtime in the Northern Rockies.Under socialism and fiat money, one of the 10 tenets of communism.
Strategery Grift Reaerve
Honest question: for an individual (as opposed to a business or group) why wouldn't carefully and competently executed single-sig cold storage be just as secure as multi-sig? (Or perhaps even better given the smaller number of variables to manage is less prone to error). It is a bit sacrilegious to say this . . . so if you are a multi-sig maxi, give me some reasoned arguments, please.