The Bitcoin Act's avatar
The Bitcoin Act
TheBitcoinAct@nostrcheck.me
npub1kx8f...r0qu
We cover #Bitcoin & legal news in our free newsletter 📰, this is where The Bitcoin Act community shares memes, takes & drops on Nostr 😎 Stay sovereign 🚀
The Bitcoin Act's avatar
The_Bitcoin_Act 2 months ago
🧵 Legal thread of the week: CLARITY Act Stalls: What It Actually Says About Bitcoin 💪₿ 1/5 The CLARITY Act is a Senate-stalled bill that passed the House last year. It tries to create federal rules for digital assets by splitting them into three buckets: digital commodities (like #Bitcoin), securities (under #SEC), and #stablecoins (dollar-pegged tokens). The whole thing is now deadlocked over one fight: whether stablecoin issuers can pay "yields" or rewards to holders. Former CFTC Chair Christopher Giancarlo just said flat out: banks need this bill way more than Bitcoiners. 👇 2/5 What the law actually says for Bitcoiners: => Bitcoin is defined as a "digital commodity" because its value comes from the decentralized blockchain itself (not a company). This puts spot Bitcoin markets and trading under the CFTC, not the SEC. => It explicitly protects self-custody: Section 605 bans federal agencies from restricting you from holding Bitcoin in your own non-custodial wallet. => Safe harbors for non-custodial tools (wallets, software) so developers aren't treated like criminals. 👇 3/5 What would actually change if it passed: => Clear CFTC rules for Bitcoin exchanges, brokers, and trading platforms (ending years of SEC overreach lawsuits). => Stronger legal shield for self-custody. => Easier institutional infrastructure, but mostly for stablecoins (the part banks are fighting over). 👇 4/5 Why it's stalled: Banks (like JPMorgan) are holding the bill hostage. They fear dollar-pegged stablecoins paying yields will pull deposits out of real banks. So they're blocking the entire package unless yields are banned. Crypto firms want the yields allowed. White House deadline of March 1 was missed. Giancarlo says if it keeps stalling, innovation just moves to Europe or Asia, and banks lose the most. Bitcoin? We never needed their "digital rails." 👇 5/5 For everyday Bitcoin holders: The parts that matter to us (CFTC clarity for Bitcoin markets + ironclad self-custody protection) are stuck because of a bank-vs-stablecoin fight. No new rules yet means continued uncertainty, but also no rushed laws handing banks control. Bitcoin stays sovereign. Stall exposes how banks need permission to compete, we don't. Stack sats, hold your own keys, ignore the noise. 👇 👉 If you care about #Bitcoin, law, and sovereignty, my newsletter breaks this down. ⚡️ Subscribe and stay ahead:
The Bitcoin Act's avatar
The_Bitcoin_Act 2 months ago
🧠 Legal Quiz of the week: 👇 How much is Kazakhstan's central bank planning to invest from its #gold and foreign exchange reserves into #crypto-linked assets? A) $100 million B) $200 million C) $350 million D) $700 million
The Bitcoin Act's avatar
The_Bitcoin_Act 2 months ago
⚡️Legal poll of the week: 🏛️ With ongoing debates in Washington, do you think the U.S. Clarity Act will be signed into law by the end of 2026? #Bitcoin 👇 Yes No Maybe What's the Clarity Act?
The Bitcoin Act's avatar
The_Bitcoin_Act 2 months ago
🧵 Legal thread of the week: Senate's Housing Bill Still Carries Temporary CBDC Ban 🚀 1/ The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act just cleared a key Senate procedural vote 84-6. This bipartisan Scott-Warren package mixes housing reforms with a temporary ban on the #Fed issuing a retail #CBDC. The ban runs only through December 31, 2030. White House supports it. Trump would likely sign. 🏛️ 2/ The bill stops the Fed and banks from creating any retail CBDC or anything substantially similar that reaches the public. But the protection vanishes at the end of 2030. Five years is nothing when the surveillance threat is permanent. ⏳😡 3/ CBDCs mean total transaction tracking and programmable restrictions: money that expires, money you can only spend in approved places. Delaying this nightmare until 2030 gives Bitcoin a short breathing room as the truly private, decentralized alternative. But the clock is ticking. 🔒 4/ The exception spares open, permissionless systems like Bitcoin with no central issuer. The ban targets retail CBDC, the exact dystopian tool privacy advocates have warned about for years. House Republicans forced this language to secure votes. Still, it is only temporary. 🧠 5/ This is not victory. Standalone CBDC bans have died in the past. This one sunsets in 2030. A future Congress can easily extend it, repeal it, or flip the switch and launch the digital dollar after that date. The danger remains alive. 👀 6/ Legislation hides poison pills in unrelated bills constantly. This one buys roughly five years against a surveillance-state digital currency. Bitcoin holders must stay locked on the House reconciliation process. The bill moves there next for final changes and vote. 🏠→🪙 7/ Bottom line is brutal: a short-term shield exists for Bitcoin’s advantage over centralized digital fiat. The long-term fight never stops. The fact that a CBDC could legally arrive in 2030 is terrible. Vigilance on Capitol Hill is non-negotiable. 💪 👉 If you care about #Bitcoin, law, and sovereignty, my newsletter breaks this down. ⚡️ Subscribe and stay ahead:
The Bitcoin Act's avatar
The_Bitcoin_Act 2 months ago
🧠 Legal Quiz of the week: 👇 Which state-owned French firm is exploring #Bitcoin mining operations in Brazil to monetize excess solar energy? A) EDF (Électricité de France) B) TotalEnergies C) Engie D) Schneider Electric