[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
[bit] max⚡️
bitmax@bitnode.one
npub142x7...vwrn
entrepreneur . bitcoin advocate . data scientist and cybersecurity analyst, auditor and researcher #codeislaw #decentralize #ruleswithoutrulers
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
The speech that I could not deliver because German police burst into our Berlin venue to disband our Palestine Congress (1930s style). Judge for yourselves the kind of society Germany is becoming when its police bans the following words: Friends, Congratulations, and heartfelt thanks, for being here, despite the threats, despite the ironclad police outside this venue, despite the panoply of the German press, despite the German state, despite the German political system that demonises you for being here. “Why a Palestinian Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, a German journalist asked me recently? Because, as Hanan Asrawi once said: “We cannot rely on the silenced to tell us about their suffering.” Today, Asrawi’s reason has grown depressingly stronger: Because we cannot rely on the silenced who are also massacred and starved to tell us about the massacres and the starvation. But there is another reason too: Because a proud, a decent people, the people of Germany, are led down a perilous road to a heartless society by being made to associate themselves with another genocide carried out in their name, with their complicity. I am neither Jewish nor Palestinian. But I am incredibly proud to be here amongst Jews and Palestinians – to blend my voice for Peace and Universal Human Rights with Jewish Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights – with Palestinian Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights. Being together, here, today, is proof that Coexistence is Not Only Possible – but that it is here! Already. “Why not a Jewish Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, the same German journalist asked me, imagining that he was being smart. I welcomed his question. For if a single Jew is threatened, anywhere, just because she or he is Jewish, I shall wear the star of David on my lapel and offer my solidarity - whatever the cost, whatever it takes. So, let’s be clear: If Jews were under attack, anywhere in the world, I would be the first to canvass for a Jewish Congress in which to register our solidarity. Similarly, when Palestinians are massacred because they are Palestinians – under a dogma that to be dead they must have been Hamas – I shall wear my keffiyeh and offer my solidarity whatever the cost, whatever it takes. Universal Human Rights are either universal or they mean nothing. With this in mind, I answered the German journalist’s question with a few of my own: · Are 2 million Israeli Jews, who were thrown out of their homes and into an open air prison 80 years ago, still being kept in that open air prison, without access to the outside world, with minimal food and water, no chance of a normal life, of travelling anywhere, and bombed periodically for 80 years? No. · Are Israeli Jews being starved intentionally by an army of occupation, their children writhing on the floor, screaming from hunger? No. · Are there thousands of Jewish injured children no surviving parents crawling through the rubble of what used to be their homes? No. · Are Israeli Jews being bombed by the world’s most sophisticated planes and bombs today? No. · Are Israeli Jews experiencing complete ecocide of what little land they can still call their own, not one tree left under which to seek shade or whose fruit to taste? No. · Are Israeli Jewish children killed by snipers today at the orders of a member-state of the UN? No. · Are Israeli Jews driven out of their homes by armed gangs today? No. · Is Israel fighting for its existence today? No. If the answer to any of these questions was yes, I would be participating in a Jewish Solidarity Congress today. Friends, Today, we would have loved to have a decent, democratic, mutually-respectful debate on how to bring Peace and Universal Human Rights for everyone, Jews and Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with people who think differently to us. Sadly, the whole of the German political system has decided not to allow this. In a joint statement including not just the CDU-CSU or the FDP but also the SPD, the Greens and, remarkably, two leaders of Die Linke, joined forces to ensure that such a civilised debate, in which we may disagree agreeably, never takes place in Germany. I say to them: You want to silence us. To ban us. To demonise us. To accuse us. You, therefore, leave us with no choice but to meet your accusations with our accusations. You chose this. Not us. · You accuse us of anti-Semitic hatred o We accuse you of being the antisemite’s best friend by equating the right of Israel to commit war crimes with the right of Israeli Jews to defend themselves. · You accuse us of supporting terrorism o We accuse you of equating legitimate resistance to an Apartheid State with atrocities against civilians which I have always and will always condemn, whomever commits them – Palestinians, Jewish Settlers, my own family, whomever. o We accuse you of not recognising the duty of the people of Gaza to tear down the Wall of the open prison they have been encased in for 80 years – and of equating this act of tearing down the Wall of Shame – which is no more defensible than the Berlin Wall was – with acts of terror. · You accuse us of trivialising Hamas’ October 7th terror o We accuse you of trivialising the 80 years of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and the erection of an ironclad Apartheid system across Israel-Palestine. o We accuse you of trivialising Netanyahu’s long-term support of Hamas as a means of destroying the 2-State Solution that you claim to favour. o We accuse you of trivialising the unprecedented terror unleashed by the Israeli army on the people of Gaza, W. Bank and E. Jerusalem. · You accuse the organisers of today’s Congress that we are, and I quote, “not interested in talking about possibilities for peaceful coexistence in the Middle East against the background of the war in Gaza”. Are you serious? Have you lost your mind? o We accuse you of supporting a German state that is, after the United States, the largest supplier of the weapons that the Netanyahu government uses to massacre Palestinians as part of a Grand Plan to make a 2-State solution, and peaceful coexistence between Jews and Palestinians, impossible. o We accuse you of never answering the pertinent question that every German must answer: How much Palestinian blood must flow before your, justified, guilt over the Holocaust is washed away? So, let’ s be clear: We are here, in Berlin, with our Palestinian Congress because, unlike the German political system and the German media, we condemn genocide and war crimes regardless of who is perpetrating them. Because we oppose Apartheid in the land of Israel-Palestine no matter who has the upper hand – just as we opposed Apartheid in the American South or in South Africa. Because we stand for universal human rights, freedom and equality among Jews, Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians in the Ancient Land of Palestine. And so that we are even clearer on the questions, legitimate and malignant, that we must always be ready to answer: Do I condemn Hamas’ atrocities? I condemn every single atrocity, whomever is the perpetrator or the victim. What I do notcondemn is armed resistance to an Apartheid system designed as part of a slow-burning, but inexorable, ethnic cleansing program. Put differently, I condemn every attack on civilians while, at the same time, I celebrate anyone who risks their life to TEAR DOWN THE WALL. Is Israel not engaged in a war for its very existence? No, it is not. Israel is a nuclear-armed state with perhaps the most technologically advanced army in the world and the panoply of the US military machine having its back. There is no symmetry with Hamas, a group which can cause serious damage to Israelis but which has no capacity whatsoever to defeat Israel’s military, or even to prevent Israel from continuing to implement the slow genocide of Palestinians under the system of Apartheid that has been erected with long-standing US and EU support. Are Israelis not justified to fear that Hamas wants to exterminate them? Of course they are! Jews have suffered a Holocaust that was preceded with pogroms and a deep-seated antisemitism permeating Europe and the Americas for centuries. It is only natural that Israelis live in fear of a new pogrom if the Israeli army folds. However, by imposing Apartheid on their neighbours, by treating them like sub-humans, the Israeli state is stoking the fires of antisemitism, is strengthening Palestinians and Israelis who just want to annihilate each other and, in the end, contributes to the awful insecurity consuming Jews in Israel and the Diaspora. Apartheid against the Palestinians is the Israelis’ worst self-defence. What about antisemitism? It is always a clear and present danger. And it must be eradicated, especially amongst the ranks of the Global Left and the Palestinians fighting for Palestinian civil liberties –around the world. Why don’t Palestinians pursue their objectives by peaceful means? They did. The PLO recognised Israel and renounced armed struggle. And what did they get for it? Absolute humiliation and systematic ethnic cleansing. That is what nurtured Hamas and elevated it the eyes of many Palestinians as the only alternative to a slow genocide under Israel’s Apartheid. What should be done now? What might bring Peace to Israel-Palestine? · An immediate ceasefire. · The release of all hostages: Hamas’ and the thousands held by Israel. · A Peace Process, under the UN, supported by a commitment by the International Community to end Apartheid and to safeguard Equal Civil Liberties for All. · As for what must replace Apartheid, it is up to Israelis and Palestinians to decide between the 2-state solution and the solution of a Single Federal Secular State. Friends, We are here because vengeance is a lazy form of grief. We are here to promote not vengeance but Peace and Coexistence across Israel-Palestine. We are here to tell German democrats, including our former comrades of Die Linke, that they have covered themselves in shame long enough – that two wrongs do not one right make – that allowing Israel to get away with war crimes is not going to ameliorate the legacy of Germany’s crimes against the Jewish People. Beyond today’s Congress, we have a duty, in Germany, to change the conversation. We have a duty to persuade the vast majority of decent Germans out there that universal human rights is what matters. That Never Again means Never Again. For anyone, Jew, Palestinian, Ukrainian, Russian, Yemeni, Sudanese, Rwandan – for everyone, everywhere. In this context, I am pleased to announce that DiEM25’s German political party MERA25 will be on the ballot paper in the European Parliament election this coming June – seeking the vote of German humanists who crave a Member of European Parliament representing Germany and calling out the EU’s complicity in genocide – a complicity that is Europe’s greatest gift to the antisemites in Europe and beyond. I salute you all and suggest we never forget that none of us are free if one of us is in chains.
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
Europe is home to the ✅highest number of #Bitcoin & #Ethereum nodes ✅largest absolute number & relative share of on-chain activity ✅the most comprehensive crypto-regulation globally (MiCA) ✅two thirds of global industry jobs ✅50% of venture funded crypto projects globally ✅favorable tax regimes ✅tied with the US, the largest share of blockchain developers (29% each) ✅strong values of digital/data sovereignty and decentralization For once, Europe actually has the chance to lead a major innovation and revive its declining economy. We should better seize this chance!
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
"Let‘s talk about @ambosstech ‘s new product „Reflex“ and why you should close all channels to Amboss immediately. Reflex is a product bringing OFAC compliance to LN Nodes, yet the product is advertised as increasing „Freedom“ for node runners - and freedom, according to Amboss, apparently means compliance with some of the most unjust, racist regulations existing in the world today. OFAC enforces trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security interests. These include financially interacting with *any* individuals from countries such as Russia, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, or Syria. OFAC discriminates, based on country of birth, residency, and citizenship, against some of the most vulnerable people around the world. For years, particularly people of middle eastern descent have been subject to no-notice account freezes and account closures, if they are even able to open a bank account at all - all thanks to OFAC." ... "If you believe for bitcoin to be freedom money, and want it to remain an important tool for human rights, close all channels to amboss nodes and stop using their services immediately." Source
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
Fedimint v0.3.0: Improved Version Compatibility, New Features & Fixes Fedimint is a module based system for building federated applications. It is meant to be a trust-minimized, censorship-resistant, and private alternative to centralized applications. It ships with hips with 3 default modules: Bitcoin, Lightning, and Chaumian Ecash. #fedimint
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
We should not just import the old stuff, let´s start fresh and different ... View article → https:://highlighter.com/f7z.io/We-can-But-should-we-819l6s
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
Great insights in being valuable and get real impact - bravo! View article → https:://highlighter.com/gsovereignty@nostrovia.org/The-Unreasonable-Effectiveness-of-PabloFz7-2phzie
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
“Computer technology is on the verge of providing the ability for individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other in a totally anonymous manner. Two persons may exchange messages, conduct business, and negotiate electronic contracts without ever knowing the True Name, or legal identity, of the other. Interactions over networks will be untraceable, via extensive re-routing of encrypted packets and tamper-proof boxes which implement cryptographic protocols with nearly perfect assurance against any tampering. Reputations will be of central importance, far more important in dealings than even the credit ratings of today. These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation, the ability to tax and control economic interactions, the ability to keep information secret, and will even alter the nature of trust and reputation.” –Tim May, the Cryptoanarchist Manifesto
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
Neue Studie zeigt: Bitcoin verbraucht 56x weniger Strom als traditionelles Finanzwesen! - Blocktrainer Am 11.06.22 Der libanesisch-stämmige und mittlerweile in Frankreich lebende Wissenschaftler Michel Khazzaka nahm sich dies zum Anlass, um den Energieverbrauch des Bitcoin-Netzwerks mit möglichst akkuraten wissenschaftlichen Methoden zu untersuchen und mit dem globalen Fiat-Finanzsystem zu vergleichen. Khazzaka selbst arbeitet seit mehr als 17 Jahren als Informatik-Ingenieur und leitete verschiedene Arbeitsgruppen im Bereich des Zahlungs- und Interbankenverkehrs. Er war außerdem als Dozent an verschiedenen Universitäten auf fünf Kontinenten aktiv. In seinem 27-seitigen Paper Bitcoin: Cryptopayments Energy Efficiency stellt er auf einem wissenschaftlichen Ansatz und auf „Physik, Informatik und Ökonomie basierend“ dar, dass das Bitcoin-Netzwerk 56-mal weniger Energie verbraucht, als das klassische Bankensystem und dabei sogar doppelt bis fünffach so energieeffizient ist. ... „Bei seiner derzeitigen Kapazität kann Bitcoin PoW 412-mal mehr Energie pro Transaktion verbrauchen als das elektronische System und dabei die gleiche Arbeit 413 Mal schneller erledigen, mit einer durchschnittlichen Blockbestätigungszeit von 418,44 Sekunden (~7 Minuten/Block). Bei einer Blockrate von 10 Minuten ist Bitcoin PoW immerhin noch 288-mal schneller. Daraus können wir schließen, dass die PoW Basis-Ebene von Bitcoin heute ηBitcoin ≈ 1,2-mal energieeffizienter ist als das elektronische System auf der Transaktionsebene.“ – Michel Khazzaka ... Bitcoin-Lightning-Transaktion im Durchschnitt 345.000-mal schneller ist als das klassische System und 14-mal schneller als eine Instant-Payment-Transaktionen„, heißt es in der Studie. Dies führt in Anbetracht der anderen Faktoren zu einer Effizienzsteigerung im Millionenbereich. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass Lightning auf der Ebene einer einzelnen Transaktion Bitcoin 194 Milionen Mal energieeffizienter macht als eine klassische Zahlung und bis zu 1 Million Mal energieeffizienter als eine Instant Payment Transaktion. Wir können beobachten, dass das klassische System überoptimiert ist, um weniger Energie pro Transaktion zu verbrauchen und um Billionen von Transaktionen pro Jahr in relativ langsamer Geschwindigkeit zwischen 2 und 7 Tagen abzuschließen. Diese Überoptimierung und Spezialisierung führt dazu, dass das System fragmentiert und anfällig ist und weniger in der Lage ist, die heutigen Anforderungen an Sofortzahlungen zu erfüllen. Bitcoin hingegen hat ein höheres Leistungsverhältnis und ist dank des PoW-Baselayers seiner Blockchain in der Lage, mit dem Lightning Network sehr effizient zu skalieren.“
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
Bitcoin Mythen Die Anzahl von Bitcoins ist unbegrenzt Nein, es ist seit dem Start von Bitcoin in 2009 eine maximale Menge von unter 21 Millionen Bitcoin fest vorgegeben (s. unten). Es gab nie weniger oder mehr, das ist dann eine von vielen Fehlinformationen Mangels Recherche und Verständnis von Bitcoin oder auch Propaganda. Mining / Wegfall der Block-Subvention Mit jedem Halvening (ca. alle 4 Jahre bzw. 210.000 Blöcke wird die Blockbelohnung halbiert. Aktuell gibt es noch 6,25 Bitcoin für die erfolgreiche Block-Generierung. Das ist eine der sehr erfolgreichen Spieltheorie-Anreize bei Bitcoin. Eine weitere sind Gebühren die für jede Bitcoin-Transaktion anfallen. Mit Abnahme der Mining Subvention werden diese Transaktionsgebühren die Profitabilität regulieren und das Netzwerk weiter schützen. Das Bitcoin-Design und Protokoll hat das alles bereits seit seiner Entstehung in 2008/2009 antizipiert. Nochmal Energieverbrauch Bitcoin ist das bereits das absolut effizienteste Finanz- und Transaktionssystem, dass es je gab. "Zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung dieses Artikels verbraucht das Bitcoin-Netzwerk insgesamt schätzungsweise 113,89 TWh/Jahr. Um diese Zahl zu kontextualisieren, sind hier ein paar Vergleiche: - Die weltweite jährliche Energieversorgung beträgt ~166.071 TWh/Jahr, 1.458,2x so viel wie das Bitcoin-Netzwerk - Die [globale jährliche Stromerzeugung] (IEA - International Energy Agency - IEA) beträgt ~26.730 TWh/Jahr, 234,7x so viel wie das Bitcoin-Netzwerk - Die Menge an Strom, die bei der Übertragung und Verteilung jedes Jahr verloren geht, beträgt ~2.205 TWh/Jahr, 19,4x so viel wie das Bitcoin-Netzwerk (basierend auf Schätzungen der Weltbank und der IEA) - Der Energie-Fußabdruck von ständig eingeschalteten elektrischen Geräten in amerikanischen Haushalten beträgt ~1.375 TWh/Jahr, 12,1x so viel wie das Bitcoin-Netzwerk" Es gibt nicht genug Bitcoin für alle Menschen auf der Welt "Es wird maximal 21 Millionen bitcoin geben. Jeder bitcoin kann in 100 Millionen Satoshis geteilt werden. Das bedeutet, dass es einen Gesamtvorrat von 2,1 Quadrillionen Satoshis (das sind 2.100.000.000.000.000.000) geben wird. Bei einer Weltbevölkerung von 8 Milliarden (aufgerundet) entspricht das 262.500 Sats für jede Person auf dem Planeten. Genug für alle, meinst du nicht auch?" Miner werden das Minen aufgeben wenn die Block-Subvention fällt "... die allgemeine Erwartung ist, dass wenn die Block-Subvention sinkt, die Gebühren steigen werden und die Miner weiterhin für ihre Arbeit bei der Verarbeitung von Transaktionen und der Sicherung des Netzwerks entschädigt werden. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt wird die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass es eine allgemein akzeptierte Skalierungslösung wie Lightning gibt, viel größer sein. Selbst wenn einige Miner mit dem Mining aufhören würden, würde das Netzwerk dank der “Schwierigkeitsanpassung” immer noch einwandfrei funktionieren und Blöcke würden immer noch im Durchschnitt alle 10 Minuten produziert werden. Die Profitabilität reguliert sich von selbst." Quellen: Allgemeines Q+A Einfache Antworten auf die häufigsten Bitcoin-Fragen Bitcoin-Mythen Gegenargumente zu den häufigsten Bitcoin-Missverständnissen
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
By EZ in News — Mar 25, 2024 Julian Assange US Extradition Appeal Ruling to be Delivered Tomorrow "London's High Court will hand down its ruling on Tuesday on whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will be able to appeal against extradition from Britain to the United States, in what could be his final legal challenge in British courts," reported Reuters.
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
El Salvador Has Thousands More Bitcoins Than Previously Known March 15, 2024 El Salvador has moved over 5,000 BTC into a cold wallet, nearly doubling its known stash of the digital asset. The country's President, Nayib Bukele, referred to the new setup as "our first #Bitcoin piggy bank" and stored the cold wallet in a physical vault within the national territory. This revelation shows that El Salvador has been holding more bitcoins than previously believed, with public trackers placing its trove at less than 3,000 BTC. The majority of the bitcoin held in the cold wallet came from Bitfinex, according to Arkham Intelligence. El Salvador BTC UTXOs Bitcoin Balance 5699.74984418• $404.367.840
[bit] max⚡️'s avatar
bitmax 1 year ago
The Stress Of Self Custody - The Bitcoin Manual Those who think Bitcoin is worth nothing likely own none, and dismissing something when you haven’t experienced it is rather lazy.  How can you have a qualified opinion on something you’ve never tried?  How do you know it is a poor store of value, slow, or cumbersome to use if you’ve never performed a transaction? How do you know it’s worth nothing if you’ve never exchanged value for it or purchased something with it? It sounds like you are writing cheques with nothing backing them; I guess that’s just the fiat mindset, right? ... Unbothered. Moisturised. Happy. In My Lane. Focused on not stuffing up my chance at generational wealth It’s fun and games speculating on Bitcoin using an exchange and relying on a custodian to handle the asset on your behalf, but that’s not Bitcoin. You don’t own anything; you only have a promise to withdraw Bitcoin in the future, a future that is uncertain—ask FTX users. -------- Der Stress der Selbstverwaltung – Das Bitcoin-Handbuch Diejenigen, die denken, Bitcoin sei nichts wert, besitzen wahrscheinlich keine, und etwas abzutun, wenn man es noch nicht erlebt hat, ist ziemlich faul. Wie kann man eine qualifizierte Meinung zu etwas haben, das man noch nie ausprobiert hat? Woher wissen Sie, dass es sich um einen schlechten Wertaufbewahrungsmittel handelt, langsam oder umständlich zu verwenden ist, wenn Sie noch nie eine Transaktion durchgeführt haben? Woher wissen Sie, dass es nichts wert ist, wenn Sie nie etwas dafür eingetauscht oder etwas damit gekauft haben? Es hört sich so an, als würden Sie Schecks ausstellen, die nicht gedeckt sind. Ich schätze, das ist einfach die Fiat-Denkweise, oder? ... Unbeschwert. Schwitzend. Glücklich. Auf meinem Weg. Ich habe mich darauf konzentriert, meine Chance auf Generationenreichtum nicht zu verspielen. Es macht Spaß, mit Hilfe einer Börse auf Bitcoin zu spekulieren und sich darauf zu verlassen, dass eine Depotbank den Vermögenswert in Ihrem Namen verwaltet, aber das ist kein Bitcoin. Du besitzt nichts; Sie haben nur das Versprechen, Bitcoin in der Zukunft abzuheben, eine Zukunft, die ungewiss ist – fragen Sie FTX-Benutzer.