Those who keep dry powder in 2025 will be rewarded.

Be prepared for 2025 to be exhausting. View quoted note →

Huh.. well that’s interesting.

Have you heard of Amy Eskridge? Because I know you guys love the weird shit, otherwise — lesbihonest — you wouldn’t be here. Well, with UAP re-entering the zeitgeist, and now electrogravitic propulsion systems entering the Overton Window, I thought it was a good moment to highlight a very important dynamic to these topics. There is a lot of weirdness that comes with gravitical physics — something that is most certainly not widely known by the NPCs and normies. This is why I want to have a conversation about Amy Eskridge. Our girl, may she rest in peace, was at a powerful nexus point of controversial topics: captured academia, UFOs/UAPs, fringe physics, black budget research, and DoD funding (untraceable funds more like). Amy Catherine Eskridge died June 11th, 2022. She was Chairwoman and President of The Institute for Exotic Science. Amy graduated from University of Alabama with a double major in chemistry and biology with a reputation for multidimensional expertise in: electrical engineering, chemistry, physics, genetic engineering, and nanotechnology. Amy’s friend, Sam Reid (CEO of Geometric Energy Corporation) named one of the company’s Earth Orbit satellites and their “DOGE-1” payload (curious naming), that was destined for the moon, after her. Her dad, Richard H. Eskridge, was a propulsion researcher at NASA’s George C. Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Remember Huntsville, the two never left. And will be brought up in the video clip shortly. This story is very dense, so I’m going to practice KISS and simply provide topics, information, and sources from here. No need for pretty words. The Institute for Exotic Science In 2018, Amy co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science in Huntsville, Alabama, serving as its President and Chairwoman. This public benefit corporation focused on cutting-edge technologies, including propulsion, quantum gravity, and material science. The institute aimed to create a collaborative environment for scientists and engineers to explore revolutionary concepts in these fields. HAL5 2018 Presentation On December 6, 2018, Amy delivered a presentation titled "A Historical Perspective on Anti-Gravity Technology" at the Huntsville Alabama L5 Society (HAL5). In her talk, she reviewed the timeline of anti-gravity research, discussing devices from Brown's Gravitator in the 1920s to the modern EM Drive. She also highlighted the challenges and controversies associated with anti-gravity research, emphasizing the need for independently funded studies to advance the field. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2018 HAL5 Presentation Audience Q&A portion: Audience: (55:28) "You talked about funding, and uh, that seems to be the common denominator in all this stuff. Funding or lack of. Who is... where is there any money that you know of? Are you aware of any private money that's being spent on this? Is anyone talking to angel investors, or, that sort of stuff?" Amy: (55:50) "Let me give you the down-low on the money situation. So, you've got your black budgets. That obviously is well funded. And then you've got your academic budget which is non-existent because they think it's hokey. And then you have your random billionaires, who have a hobby, and they made their money doing something else. But they're applying their money towards weird anti-gravity stuff because they want to be known for something other than what they made their money in. So there's several, there's a handful of random billionaires running around, who fund these types of things. The Churches Chicken Fried billionaire funded the Hathaway Lab. The American Best Inn and Suites billionaire, Robert Bigelow, of course is Bigelow Aerospace. There are some others that I know of." Amy: (56:42) "But, we're really trying to address that problem with The Institute that we're doing, because I've seen government research, I've seen academic research, I've seen private research, and money is always the problem. The technology is never the problem. The technology is there. And the talent is there. So what we've done with the institute is we've sort of assembled some of these random people, with big budgets and a hobby, and we've said 'hey can we pool money into a big stable pot of money' so that we can have a safe well-funded sandbox for smart people to play in, and not have to worry about government election cycles affecting their budget, or tenure effecting their budget, or even when you find your billionaire sometimes the billionaire runs out of money, or loses interest, or disappears. So you can't just be dependent on one wealthy investor. You need a big pot of money that's stable, that isn't going anywhere. So that's what we're trying to do with the institute. Just fund the institute. And then pick projects that we think are promising, and then fund those. So we're kind of creating a new vehicle for funding this type of research. That's the approach I'm taking right now?" Audience: (58:08) "Is there any possibility of... I know this is probably hard, if not impossible to do... but cross-over between black-world and the illuminated world? Because frequently things move from the illuminated world into the black-world. And they disappear." Amy: (58:26) "Yeah. We've noticed that." Audience: (58:30) "But, I mean it's to the black-worlds advantage to keep the illuminated world going, because, that acts as a spawning ground for ideas that they might not have. The black world. So, it's not necessarily to their advantage to keep it completely stagnated. And potentially, since Griffin is now at the pinnacle of the group that controls DARPA, and he has a history that goes through UAH, there would seem to be possibly some fertile ground for some conversation..." Amy: (59:16) "Yeah, um, I've thought about that. The combination of the private and the public-private institution, and working with the 'blacker budget.'" Audience: (59:31) "A quote from Griffin. 'NASA is no longer, by any means, a research organization.'" Amy: (59:39) "That is a Griffin quote." Audience: (59:41) "Yeah, that is a Griffin quote." Amy: (59:45) "Yeah, I imagine there are some string opinions about Griffin in the room." Stuff gets awkward in the audience at this point, and Amy moves onto talking about corporate structure and why it's structured the way it is. Audience: (01:04:28) "SO WHAT ABOUT THE INNOVATOR WHO IS AFRAID OF DISAPPEARING?" Amy: (01:04:31) "Well, that's a whole 'nother problem. *audience laughs* I think doing it in the public is better in that case. That's a different..." Audience: (01:04:44) "That doesn't mean you won't disappear. Even if you do it in the public, that still don't mean the inventor won't disappear for lots of reasons." Audience: (01:04:55) "Like Ning Li!" — There is much, much more to read. Use the URL below. — Source: https://archive.is/2023.08.02-221219/https://pad.riseup.net/p/KPy5hBybGiN6Qek1liNF#selection-525.0-685.36 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Our boy Ashton Forbes finds relying on his work and work ethic, yet again, here. Work with NASA Amy's father, Richard H. Eskridge, was a retired NASA engineer and scientist. Together, they co-founded HoloChron Engineering, a company specializing in gravity modification research and development. While specific details of Amy's direct collaborations with NASA are limited, her family's connection to the agency and her involvement in advanced propulsion research suggest a close association. Nanotechnology Amy's academic background included significant work in nanotechnology. She conducted research in Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS), focusing on testing piezoelectric microcantilevers and gyroscopes. Additionally, she worked on non-viral polymeric drug delivery formulations and gene therapy research, demonstrating her versatility across multiple scientific disciplines. Strange Circumstances In an interview on August 25, 2024, former UK counter-intelligence officer Franc Milburn discussed his investigation into Amy's death. He mentioned that her passing had been labeled a suicide but expressed skepticism about this conclusion, citing a lack of thorough investigation and the swift cremation of her body. Milburn also noted that Amy had been a victim of surveillance and harassment prior to her death, which he believed could be connected to her work in anti-gravity research. Franc Mullner, who seems to have had an intimate friendship or some form of relationship with Ms. Eskridge. Whatever it is, he joined the Coast To Coast AM show to discuss what he knew about… “interesting” events that she, and those close to her, experienced. So, what do you think? I can tell you what I think. But I won’t. Who was Amy Eskridge? Who was Ning Li? How is it that these two women wind up dead, working in the same field? Why do so many scientists in this area of research and physics wind up disappeared or dead? ----------------------------------------------------------------- For access to sources and video content, follow the link to my substack below:

Who Was Amy Eskridge?

And what happened to her?

Today a number of worlds came crashing together at supersonic speed for most, but not for those of you that have read my piece “The Grand Scheme?” There is a relatively high likelihood that you have heard about the Cybertruck “bombing” that occurred out front of Trump Tower in Las Vegas, Nevada. Let’s go over a few of the datapoints: - Matt Livelsberger was a Green Beret Team Sergeant - He is the supposed deceased individual in the driver’s seat of the Cybertruck that immolated in front of Trump Tower - The DNA of the body was obtained by a family member, NOT collected from the body itself, and the body was so scorched it wasn’t identifiable* - The Cybertruck detonated with fireworks*, not professional quality IEDs or VBIDs as GB’s are trained to have expertise in recognizing as well as relying upon - The deceased had a Desert Eagle with the body, with a gunshot wound to the head* - Livelsberger’s Army ID and Passport were found within the truck, intact, and legible* There’s already a ton of weirdness in the above information. Things continue to get weird. Matt had contacted Sam Shoemate (@samosaur on Twitter), CW2 intelligence officer (US Army, Ret.), with the email below. Shawn Ryan recorded an emergency podcast to brief about this situation, with Shoemate in attendance as guest. Which can be found here. Thanks to my exploits with my Bitcoin Veterans organization and peers, and particularly because of my loud mouth and clear addiction to Twitter, I am graced with some very, very interesting and impressive connections that I consider to be great friends. We have been discussing this situation all day. There is a lot that does not add up here. A highly trained, and clearly successful GB blowing up a bulletproof truck with fireworks does not make sense to be a botched terror attack. This man would have had the capability to make a very effective (and non-defective) ordinance to accomplish significant damage to a soft target like a hotel in Las Vegas. Then said individual also, supposedly, deletes himself with a .50 round to the head from a Desert Eagle that was present in the truck. Why the Desert Eagle… why the flare. The Email Now the meat on this is what was stated in the email sent to Shoemate. Livelsberger suggests that what we’ve been seeing of the drones situation on the East Coast has been craft of Chinese origins that are running operational gravitic propulsion systems. Stating that China and the US are the only elements on the planet that have the technological capabilities for such craft (wrong, Russia has them as well). That these craft have been launching from submarines for years. And that they have been used for SIGINT and ISR deployments. This sounds like science fiction to the majority. But I assure you, it most certainly is not. MH370 In order to get to where we’re going we must first take a quick step backwards. This situation ties right back into a thread that one of my favorite Twitter accounts has been tugging on for over a year now. In March of 2014 a Boeing 777 sent out a distress call stating that the aircraft was “disintegrating” and that the pilots were heading for an emergency landing. A few hours later the aircraft vanished. Ashton Forbes is a name that should be household by now. He has single handedly pushed the MH370 flight back into the forefront of social attention. Why? MH370 disappeared under… interesting circumstances, and Ashton dug up some interesting videos. We’re not here to talk about the entire topic (it’s very, VERY dense) but if you are uninformed on MH370 go here. How this ties into Livelsberger is the mention of electrogravitics in his email. Twitter is ablaze right now with claims that the topic is “mental illness” or how Shoemate put with Shawn Ryan; science fiction. Or that because the email mentions so many hot button topics that it’s clearly fake. What if I were to tell you that not only are electrogravitics not fake, but they are real, even operational currently, as Livelsberger is attempting to reveal in his email. Going so far as to say that the technologies are patented. Lt Col Tom Bearden We also have work that has been highlighted by the likes of Ashton Forbes, as well as Dr. Steven Greer, coming from the likes of one Lt Col Thomas Bearden, US Army. These technologies are real. They have been for decades. And they have been hidden from us, The People for a very long time. While part of me agrees that this technology should not be getting hidden another part of me feels that it’s for the best at our current state. I also have to share the very real risks of such technologies, and why Matt Livelsberger claimed that these technologies as being used by China and the US were a Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) scenario. Imagine a craft that were to be successfully utilizing these technologies and theories. Our current grappling with physics should suggest that these capabilities are nothing but magic or of pure science fiction. But what do we know about advance technology and it appearing to be magic? So, what if it is real? Something that can manipulate gravity can effectively cancel out the effects of gravity. Meaning? You can potentially create a bubble around your person, or craft, that is not impacted by the forces of gravity. You are not limited by the material that is absconded with gravitational forces. Atmosphere. You would therefore not be limited by such forces as aerodynamics, drag, turbulence etc. You could also use this technology to move the very same through water. Not being limited by the physical forces that encumber such crafts as our maritime vessels and submarines. Now, things get really, really weird (as if they aren’t already) thanks to our friend Lt Col Bearden. Below he discusses the capabilities of using such understanding of this science and physics to be capable of manipulating 4th dimensional energy (4DE) — what Nikola Tesla referred to as “Aether” — to be capable of using 4DE for such devices as directed energy weapons (DEWs) that could truly vaporize matter or, as Ashton Forbes puts, accumulate matter. Even at a distance. These devices/craft can be capable of traveling 100s-1000s of miles per second without experiencing g-forces and can traverse through water as freely as air. Essentially “blinking” from space to feet from ground/sea level. Like we saw with the Tic-Tac event. That’s why in the email he says they are such a MAD risk. Think about it, they could be loaded with ordinance in China, or Russia, or Syria, or where-have-you, blink to anywhere in the US (or the world) in a few seconds, release ordinance, blink out before detonation, reload, and repeat… Electrogravitics is real. It’s time to wake up. -------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for reading. As a supplement to this writing I have provided patents to a number of technologies that involve manipulation of gravity, and electromagnetics (aka electrogravitics being the combined focus) in my substack at the link below:

Livelsberger, Shawn Ryan, Electrogravitics and MH370

Reality is so much weirder than science fiction, and the patents to prove it.

For your timeline, a gift 🎁

Sam Hyde is the bitcoin proponent we needed, not the one we deserved.

The Yakutian-Russian fight video circulating on twitter is an example of proper masculinity in a moment of potent darkness. To fight to the death, but honor your enemy is the best any man can do in that situation.

🚨Hot Take: Once you grasp bitcoin and bitcoin mining… If you do not create a company that is involved in either ecosystem, move on. Gain ground in another field of study, career, passion, whatever. Why? Becoming an example of how you can grok and benefit from Bitcoin, without being one of the memes that only talks about ₿, and has become an evangelist trying to “convert” followers from fiat, you become a living example of what bitcoin can do — for literally anybody, and everybody. Plus, it’s more fun IMO.

Truth has time on its side. Lies are in a race against time. View quoted note →

My response to Eric Weinstein’s comments on Twitter over the immigration/H1-B conversation. Sometimes the best way to orange pill is taking a tertiary, tangential approach.

The immigration/H1-B conversation over on Twitter has entered Phase 2 of the boss battle.

Visualize the headshot.

Nostalgia +1

Nostalgia.

Missing the old days of gaming tonight.

If you have twitter still, I would appreciate your Like/RT to push back on these hucksters trying to claim that Bitcoin is a Chinese Op that is bad for America. Those hucksters are Gen Mike Flynn and Michael Yonn — both men I respect, but must be pushed back on here.

You guys think the AI & Crypto stuff is annoying now… The people are not equipped to handle this kind of scam factory.

Bro… AI can dogfight in fighter jets and win, against humans. View quoted note →