The ordinals folks seem to be piggy backing off of the permanence and immutability of the BTC blockchain, but that permanence only exists in conjunction with the consensus rules. As soon as you start hallucinating new tokens and protocols based on arbitrary data, you've already diverged from consensus and there's nothing permanent to your subjective interpretation of that data.

Any other iOS users tried Keet and it didn't work at all?

What if the lack of privacy on the base BTC layer ends up being a good thing? If, long into the future, it's mostly large institutions using the main chain for settlement, we might be better off with things being easier to audit (e.g., for detecting fraud).

Some nice travel ✈️ listening from @Guy Swann https://open.spotify.com/episode/4PtyG2ZcCOICn6Rbaork3f?si=iuOdb3iORO6GBYTtnIp-3w

I’m developing an unhealthy addiction to notes and other stuff

I hope everyone recognizes zapping is a taxable event. Please remember to calculate your capital gains on every sat. 🙄

Firmware upgrades are a bit glitchy but otherwise works pretty well

Reading "Going Infinite" by Michael Lewis and it's interesting how much of the scam perpetrated by SBF was essentially fractional reserve banking

Gave a listen to this excellent podcast from @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 on SegWit and TapRoot last night. Very informative, and definitely requires full attention:

🎙Bitcoin.Review Podcast

BR029 - SegWit, Taproot, Schnoor, Inscriptions & Witness Discount ft. Andrew Poelstra & Adam Gibson

I’m joined by guests Andrew Poelstra and Adam Gibson to discuss SegWit and related issues including taproot, schnoor, inscriptions and the witnes...

Big fan of being able to purchase sats through Primal, but the Apple tax is gross

Epic rant from @Guy Swann

Guy’s Take_077 - Dear Government… — Bitcoin Audible — Overcast