Patrick Boehler's avatar
Patrick Boehler
patrick@nos.social
npub1n8gv...ufd0
Media and tech
Agreeing here: “Durov and Telegram might yet be exonerated from the charges they face—and we should indeed reserve judgment as the case unfolds. But nothing about his arrest to date suggests that it has anything to do with ‘free speech.’ The narrative that global authoritarian censors are persecuting a free speech hero is pure myth-making in this case.”
My favorite #Riga scene: this Putin portrait is the view the Russian ambassador wakes up to. Latvian know right from wrong. image
Russia / Venezuela: Signal's built-in censorship circumvention feature might be able to help if a connection is affected: Signal Settings > Privacy > Advanced > Censorship circumvention (on)
Mass outages of YouTube in Russia today, this affects how millions of people get information https://denvergazette.com/news/nation-world/youtube-slowdown-in-russia-darkens-freedom-of-speech-outlook/article_eadc3592-dae0-5fba-a3fb-141c7c95c301.html everyone has been expecting this to happen sooner or later, but the assumption was it won’t for as long as pro Putin propaganda dominated on YouTube which is probably still the case. Curious if that changed or if the regime now just feels sufficiently confident in VK as a satisfactory substitute.
“The harms of surveillance aren't merely spiritual and psychological – they're material and immediate. The commercial surveillance industry provides the raw feedstock for a parade of horribles, from stalkers and bounty hunters turning up on their targets' front doors to cops rounding up demonstrators with location data from their phones to identity thieves tricking their marks by using leaked or purchased private information as convincers: The problem with Google's monopolization of the surveillance business model is that they're spying on us. But for a certain kind of competition wonk, the problem is that Google is monopolizing the violation of our human rights, and we need to use competition law to "democratize" commercial surveillance.”
The Citizens and Technology Lab at Cornell is running a survey for a project to study the privacy expectations and content moderation experiences of people who use encrypted messaging apps.
Every month, I set aside one afternoon to write and reflect about my work and the media space more broadly in a newsletter. It's very helpful as an exercise to pause and reflect. I strongly recommend it. This month, I wrote about some similarities between audience research and investigative reporting in their purest forms. Some wishful thinking around platform and vendor data certainty, in research along with performative aspects of both fields, has made the two drift apart. In reality, they're actually quite similar. Journalism is much simpler than we make it out to be. It only gets complicated when we seek to perpetuate systems that aren't of service. This is the real opportunity right now: to disentangle and rebuild.
A media project I consulted with is looking for a UX frontend designer with native Chinese skills to work full time on a new b2b media venture, remotely from anywhere ideally US, (just not Chinese mainland.)
I'm worried that by the time we're collectively ready to move beyond Big Tech walled gardens, most publications will already be locked into Threads as their primary platform. While Flipboard is great at bringing publications to the fediverse, relying on volunteers to do this for their favorite media outlets (like someone in New Jersey does for RFA) isn't sustainable and doesn't grant true ownership. Could we develop a program that: 1. Establishes nostr identities for news organizations to claim when ready? 2. Utilizes RSS feeds or alternative sources to build a following? 3. Offers support to individual journalists and newsrooms? 4. Pursues web-of-trust verification and actively recommends accounts? This could extend to other public utilities, such as transit systems or weather services.