TL;DR: Why the Ft Hood Shooter is being Executed, aka How they plan to Draft your ass Through an unrelated disaster such as nationwide cyberattack blackout mixed with gas and diesel shortage, they plan to gather the American people to military bases, Amazon warehouses and possibly the new datacenters near your hometown. One day nearby there are no grocery stores stocked. For a while everything we will be good. You check in, the food is good and free, you don't have to work, and you start to get used to seeing your friends at the disaster relief cafeteria where the only food in town is. It feels like America is... okay. You don't have to work, you still get fed, you still get rationed power for a few hours of the day to charge your devices and play games. It goes like this for a few months. While you are there getting food at the goy lines one day just like always, everyone is crowding around the TV. The nearest big city just got nuked. You don't know if it's AI or not. Doesn't matter. Doors locked. No one is allowed to leave. The next wave of people coming for food show up and get locked in a similar room. Then the next one. Then the next one. You remember the Ft Hood shooters execution on TV. You didn't bring your gun because you were just coming to get your food like you always have for the last few months and they routinely check cars on the way in. The draft is now activated. You thought you would be home. You thought you'd have time to react. And those 5G towers? Used to find the stragglers who manage to be living outside this system. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. Don't goto where the free food is

It's a great time for nostr to distance itself from self identifying as "social media"

Alright I've got a question for the Cypherpunks out there who have made iOS apps... did yall really all email the NSA with your address and phone number saying "i have encryption in my app" or is there a workaround to this lol

I think the "temporary" nature of #BIP110 is actually it's what leads to the reasoning of @ODELL that it has potential for being used to "threaten a reorg" later. The rejoining of the chains later does actually just seems like more risk than reward and threatens history of the main chain in the case of the BIP failing. I'm running #BIP110 right now because it's directionally correct and majority support of the BIP would be better than it failing completely. But if someone makes a BIP-110 version that is not "temporary" I will run this, as I view it much safer for bitcoin, because it can either succeed or fail gracefully.