52 new verdicts were released today.
* 25 products were custodial
* 8 were closed source
* 8 were wallets but not for #Bitcoin
* 5 turned out to be no wallets at all
* 2 were vapor ware
* 1 did not support sending or receiving Bitcoin - only speculating on its value
* 1 was not released yet
* 1 was do-it-yourself
* 1 will need more investigations
WalletScrutiny
_@WalletScrutiny.com
npub1j9kt...uswx
Know your wallet like you made it!
Our goal is to improve the security of Bitcoin wallets by examining products for transparency and potential attacks.
Cypherock X1 joins the group of reproducible Bitcoin wallets.


WalletScrutiny
Cypherock X1
Review of Cypherock X1 (verdict: sourceavailable)
In the past ten days we published **64 new wallet reviews** and another **60 updates** to verdicts.
Most of the research was done by #[0] and verified by #[1]


WalletScrutiny
Know your wallet like you built it.
Not everyone is a developer. Not everyone has to be.
Our stated mission is to look into Bitcoin Wallets and with bearer tokens like the [Opendime](https://walletscrutiny.com/bearer/opendime/) we already ventured into products that clearly are not wallets but they are meant to keep your private keys safe, so users want to know: Do they really keep you safe from loss?
Now we came across products that are marketed as "crypto vaults" but they are more akin to [password managers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Password_manager) like LastPass - a general store of important data. By being marketed to keep your important data safe, they clear are being used for Bitcoin, too. The crypto-themed one we are looking at right now has 100k installs on Google Play.
Should we look into those or is that mission creep?
From the start we wanted to look into desktop wallets but it's really hard. For example for Electrum there is 23 different ways of getting the binary and those are probably +20 different binaries.
* We do not have the resources to check them all with every release.
* We have no idea how to communicate our findings to the user.