The Bitcoin Core organisation has "in principle" capitulated.

"It can't be a serious proposal therefore I didn't answer it. Bitcoiners run node software without that prospective bug so they already decided against the change. I also care about Bitcoin's survival and I agree with you. Thank you for Bitcoin Knots which is more powerful and less buggy Bitcoin node software implementation, superior to Bitcoin Core." - that reply to @Luke Dashjr and and bitcoindev@googlegroups.com in "[bitcoindev] Relax OP_RETURN standardness restrictions" has been censored (blocked).

Unpopular opinion: self-custody is not about so-called "hardware wallets".

Test for a Bitcoiner: they don't have the goal to retire.

No, not everyone is equal in social terms. That's the foundation of social "sciences" and that's what everyone sees in the world, I suppose.

There is no financial, sexual, education or other qualified freedom.

Everybody is forced to be a "public debt" trader. #legal_tender #central_planning #autocrats

"Bitcoin is digital gold" or "gold is physical Bitcoin". Is one more accurate than the other?

Why not visually verifying hashes/digest, "Bitcoin output script descriptors", Bitcoin addresses", signatures etc. encoded and displayed as GitHub Identicoin (instead of long strings of digits and letters):

awesome-identicons

Awesome Identicon

A curated list of “Visual Hashs” (Identicon, Avatar, Fractal, RandomArt and general Hash Visualization)

?

Is Twitter down?

Voting is gambling. House always wins. Voters are losers.