No, you cannot do any use case on bitcoin. Can we do covenants now? No. Guess what, the network has to agree on that use case.

Open-source contributions will just be sharing AI token costs between members. It will even be easier to predict the cost of implementing a feature and just have people funding it.

Core 30 ppl logic: the way to fight spam is to outbid them so that they are forced to pay more. Spam in bip110 costing 1000x more : doesn't matter.

odell : oh when the chain splits Luke and mechanic will spam the main chain with nasty stuff! Dude, what's preventing ANYONE from doing it? that's the whole point of 110. What's the current plan to avoid that? Just pray really strongly that no one doesn't?

Our purpose is to drive the price of everything to zero, move to the next problem and repeat.

If you look at some blocks there is a lot of hashrate that are almost 100% bip110 compliant. viabtc and F2pool don't seem to include subsat txs wich makes most of inscriptions. So financially they loose close to zero compared to know and get no risk in a chain split. Just saying.